Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Mr Ramesh Chander Yadav vs Comptroller & Auditor General on 25 July, 2014

                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                        Room No.306, 2nd Floor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan
                              Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066.
                                        Website: cic.gov.in

                              File No.CIC/SM/C/2013/000569/RM

 Appellant:                               Shri Ramesh Chander Yadav, Korba
 Public Authority:                        O/o The Accountant General (A&E),
                                          Raipur
 Date of Hearing:                         25.07.2014
 Date of Decision:                        25.07.2014
Heard today, dated 25.07.2014 through video conferencing.

Appellant is present.

Public Authority is represented by Shri MB Satyanarayana, CPIO.

FACTS

Vide RTI dt 27.4.13, appellant had sought some information relating to GPF account no. MD-35602.

2. CPIO vide letter dt 4.6.13, provided a point wise response.

3. Written submissions are received from CPIO/Dy Accountant General, Chhatisgarh, Raipur stating that CPIO vide letter dt 4.6.13 had provided a response and that no first appeal was filed and instead the appellant had directly filed a second appeal.

4. Submissions made by the appellant and public authority were heard. CPIO submitted that a response was provided vide their letter dt 4.6.13 and the appellant did not file an appeal with the designated FAA. Appellant submitted that he is not satisfied with the response.

DECISION

5. The Commission remands the case to the designated FAA, Shri NS Pillai, AG Chattisgarh with directions to provide a response as per the provisions of the RTI Act.

The appeal is disposed of.

Sd/-

(Rajiv Mathur) Chief Information Commissioner 1 2