Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mrs. Sarika Kiran Patil vs Mr. Kiran Dhondu Patil on 25 April, 2022

Author: Nitin W. Sambre

Bench: Nitin W. Sambre

                                                                             38 MCA-50-2022.doc

BDP-SPS-TAC


   BHARAT
   DASHARATH
   PANDIT

   Digitally signed
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
   by BHARAT
   DASHARATH
   PANDIT
   Date: 2022.04.26
   19:35:22 +0530
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                      MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 50 OF 2022

                      Mrs. Sarika Kiran Patil                    .... Applicant.
                            V/s
                      Mr. Kiran Dhondu Patil                     .... Respondent.

                      Mr. Prashant D. Patil for the Applicant.
                      None for the Respondent.

                                          CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
                                           DATE:    APRIL 25, 2022

                      P.C.:-

                      1]       Heard.


                      2]       None appears for the Respondent, though served.


                      3]       Contents in the Application are not controverted.     As such,
                      following facts are established.


                      4]       Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 2nd March,

2013. Out of said wedlock, a daughter was born whose name is Monika. Her age is about five years and she is in the custody of Applicant.

5] Transfer is sought on the ground of hardship, so also for avoiding recording of overlapping findings on the similar set of facts 1/2 38 MCA-50-2022.doc and evidence. At the behest of Applicant, proceedings in the form of criminal prosecution is initiated for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code which are pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Niphad. Apart from above, I am informed that the at the behest of the Applicant other proceedings being Application No.30 of 2020 have been initiated under the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 which are pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Niphad.

6] In the aforesaid background, since the proceedings initiated by the Applicant and Respondent are based on similar set of facts and evidence, there is likelihood of recording of overlapping findings. Apart from that, Applicant is a custodian of minor daughter and the Applicant will suffer hardship, if she is made to travel from Niphad to Bandra, Mumbai.

7] As such, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Petition No.A-1309 of 2021 pending before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai is directed to be transferred to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Niphad.

8] Application is accordingly disposed of.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2