Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Karim Bhai vs State Of Maharashtra . on 12 May, 2015

     ITEM NO.101                            REGISTRAR COURT. 1                 SECTION IV

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                    BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

     Civil Appeal                 No(s).    183/2011

     KARIM BHAI                                                             Appellant(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.                                            Respondent(s)

     WITH
     C.A. No. 184/2011
     (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

     C.A. No. 185/2011
     (With Office Report)


     Date : 12/05/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.


     For Appellant(s)
                                           Mr. Mohd. Mujeeb, Adv.
                                           Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv.


     For Respondent(s)
                                           Ms.   Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv.
                                           Ms.   Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv.
                                           Ms.   Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv.
                                           Mr.   Shakil Ahmad Syed, Adv.


                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R
C.A. Nos.183 and 184/2011

All the 21 respondents have been served. The appeal is ready.

C.A. No.185/2011 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.05.18 11:09:02 IST Reason: Service of all the 23 respondents is complete. Respondent Nos.1, 2, 8, 10 and 23 have entered appearance. Remaining respondents have failed to enter appearance. Item No.101 -2- None of the parties has filed the statement of case in all the appeals. Time stipulated for the purpose has expired. Otherwise also after the amendment in Supreme Court Rules, 2013, it is no more a mandate. Chronology of events already on record is presumed to have been accepted by all the respondents.

All the appeal stand ready.

Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar