Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Daljeet Singh vs Office Of The Additional Distt. ... on 30 September, 2018

                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                      Baba Gang Nath Marg, Munirka,
                            New Delhi-110067
                                         F. No.CIC/ADDDM/A/2017/153020
                                               CIC/SDMCW/A/2018/103919
                                               CIC/SDMCQ/A/2017/137131
                                                CIC/DEPOL/A/2017/178720
                                               CIC/SDMCE/A/2017/117917
                                               CIC/SDMCW/A/2017/147567
                                               CIC/SDMCW/A/2017/137661
Date of Hearing                 :   10.09.2018
Date of Decision                :   10.09.2018
Appellant/Complainant           :   Shri Daljeet Singh
Respondent                      :   PIO/Sub-Divisional Magistrate-
                                    (Rajouri Garden), (Govt. of NCT of
                                    Delhi)
                                    2. PIO/E.E.-(M-I)/West Zone,
                                    SDMC
                                    3.PIO/Asstt. Director of
                                    Vigilance/HQ., SDMC, Vigilance
                                    Department
                                    4.PIO/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of
                                    Police, West District.
                                    5.PIO/EE-(Bldg-I)/West Zone,
                                    SDMC

                                    6. PIO/Dy. Health Officer-WZ,
                                    SDMC
Information Commissioner         : Shri Yashovardhan Azad
 Since both the parties are same, the above mentioned appeals and
 complaints are clubbed together for hearing and disposal.

Case No.       Filed on     CPIO reply      First appeal   FAO
153020         01.03.2017   10.04.2017      09.05.2017     14.07.2017
103919         13.09.2017   04.01.2018      24.10.2017     -   -
137131         28.02.2017   10.03.2017      03.04.2017     18.01.2017
178720         27.02.2017   23.03.2017      30.03.2017     02.05.2017
117917         18.10.2016   01.12.2016      13.12.2016     18.01.2017
147567         27.02.2017   30.03.2017      14.04.2017     07.06.2017
137661         18.10.2016   01.02.2017      25.02.2017     - -
                                  ORDER

1. The present batch of seven appeals emanate from different RTI applications filed with various public authorities. However, the underlying grievance of the appellant is common and hence, it would be profitable to club them all for purpose of effective adjudication.

2. The appellant is aggrieved with the acts and omissions of his neighbour residing above his house. The appellant alleges that an illegal extended balcony has been installed by his neighbour where washing activity is done. As a result, there are problems of seepage of water and tempering of rainwater drain through which, the waste water from the household is being illegally drained out by his neighbour. Due to these acts, the appellant complains that the drain water pipes are clogged leading to poor state of hygiene. Stating to be aggrieved with the indifference of his neighbour, the appellant represented before civil authorities as well as Delhi Police. Through the present RTI applications, the appellant sought multifaceted information primarily seeking the status of action taken by respective authorities.

3. All the parties are present and heard at great length. The appellant submits to have exhausted all possible channels of redressal of his grievance unsuccessfully. Respondents from Building department, Public health, DHO MCD are present. Delhi Police is also present.

4. The respondents claim that the complaints of appellant were acted upon and the premises in question was inspected. They submit that the neighbour of appellant residing on the floor above the flat of appellant had installed a sink in the balcony area and the waste water drain is connected with rain water drain which is the main cause of grievance of appellant. A challan has already been issued to the violator.

5. The Commission finds that the grievance of appellant is more due to non- cooperation of his neighbour rather than denial of information sought under the RTI Act. The respondents MCD and health department undertook to inspect the premises in question and counsel the parties to bring about an amicable settlement. Needless to say, if no settlement is reached, suitable action as per law shall be taken by the respondent authorities and the impermissible deviations shall be strictly dealt with as per the provisions of DMC Act. Assistance of Delhi Police shall be availed if required.

6. Let a compliance report with necessary photographs etc. shall be filed by respondent building/ maintenance department of MCD within 04 weeks of receipt of this order. A copy of the same shall be furnished to the appellant as well. Should the appellant remain aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail remedy in accordance with law. The captioned appeals are disposed of.

(Yashovardhan Azad) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission.

(R.P. Grover) Designated Officer