Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

WPMB/307/2023 on 19 October, 2023

Author: Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench: Rakesh Thapliyal

                    Office Notes,
                   reports, orders
                   or proceedings
SL.
         Date       or directions                      COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
                   and Registrar's
                      order with
                     Signatures
      19.10.2023                     WPMB No. 307 of 2023
                                     Hon'ble Vipin Sanghi, C.J.

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Akhil Kumar Sah and Mr. Ayush Agarwal, learned counsels for the petitioner.

2. Mr. R.S. Bisht, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no.1.

3. Issue notice.

4. Counsel appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent no. 1.

5. Let notice issue to respondent no. 2, returnable on 09.11.2023, by all permitted modes, including electronically.

6. The grievance raised by the petitioner in relation to the tender in question is, firstly, that the tender stipulates a condition of Rs. 250 crores turnover in the last three years on average basis, whereas the value of the work is in the range of about Rs. 50 crores. According to the petitioner, this is highly excessive, and this condition has been included to oust most of the players.

7. The second challenge is to the reduction in the quality requirement from CMMi Level 5 to CMMi Level 3, which, according to the petitioner, would be detrimental to the interest of the State and its people, since the respondents have lowered the quality standards.

8. Counter affidavit be filed by respondent no. 1 within two weeks.

9. In the meantime, the tender in question shall not be proceeded with.

10. List on 09.11.2023 (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) (Vipin Sanghi, C.J.) 19.10.2023 19.10.2023 Rahul