Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Dharmavir Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi . on 31 March, 2015

Bench: Dipak Misra, Uday Umesh Lalit

  CHAMBER MATTER                                SECTION II

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

      R.P.(Crl.) No. 194/2015 In Crl.A. No. 2335/2014

  DHARAMVIR SINGH                                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

  STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.                     Respondent(s)
  (With appln(s) for C/delay in filing review petition and exemption
  from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and office report)

  Date : 31/03/2015 This petition was circulated today.

  CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

                                    By Circulation

                          UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The Review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.





                         (Neeta)                             (H.S. Parasher)
                         Sr. P.A.                             Court Master

(Signed Order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Neeta Sapra Date: 2015.04.07 17:46:03 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO.194 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2335 OF 2014 DHARAMVIR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R Delay condoned.

We have carefully perused the review petition and the connected papers. We are convinced that the order against which review has been sought, does not suffer from any error apparent, warranting its reconsideration.

The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

.............................J. [DIPAK MISRA] ............................J. [UDAY UMESH LALIT] NEW DELHI MARCH 31, 2015