Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Krishna Agencies vs Smt Shamabegum Suri on 7 March, 2025

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                                      -1-
                                                                  NC: 2025:KHC-D:4418
                                                            CRL.RP No. 100439 of 2023




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                        DHARWAD BENCH

                             DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                                BEFORE

                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

                        CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100439 OF 2023
                                   (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS))

                      BETWEEN:
                      KRISHNA AGENCIES
                      SHOP/AT: PLOT NO.268, MANOJ PARK,
                      GROUND FLOOR, TRANQUIL HEIGHTS,
                      SULLA ROAD, HUBBALLI, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
                      SMT. ROOPREKHA W/O. PRAMOD VYAS PAREEK,
                      AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
                      NOW REP. BY ITS GPA HOLDER,
                      SHRI VIJAY KUMAR S/O. LATE BADRI ROY,
                      AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. SALES EXECUTIVE,
                      R/AT: MOHANPUR VILLAGE, POST: TIKLATO,
                      PS. BENGABAD, GIRIDIH, JHARKHAND-815312.
                                                                          ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI GOURISHANKAR H. MOT, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      SMT. SHAMABEGUM SURI
        Digitally

VN
        signed by V
        N BADIGER     THE PROP OF SURI PLYWOOD,
BADIGER Date:
        2025.03.14
        15:21:24      OFFICE AT SHOP NO.7, T, APMC COMPLEX,
        +0530
                      MARATHA COLONY ROAD, SHIVAJI CIRCLE,
                      TQ. DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD-500001,
                      MOB. 9916186625,
                      RESIDING AT: R/AT. KOPPADKERI JANATA PLOT,
                      2ND CROSS, DHARWAD, KARNATAKA-580008
                                                                        ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI R.M. JAVED, ADVOCATE)

                            THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W.
                      401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND MODIFY THE
                      ORDER DATED 07.07.2023 PASSED BY 2ND JMFC, AT HUBBALLI IN CC
                      NO.1152/2023 BY ENHANCING THE SENTENCE, COMPENSATION I.E.,
                      TWICE THE AMOUNT OF CHEQUE AS PER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT,
                      FINE AND INTEREST AT 12% P.A. ON THE AMOUNT ACCRUED.
                                -2-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:4418
                                     CRL.RP No. 100439 of 2023




    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:




                         ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Heard Sri.Gourishankar H. Mot and Sri.R.M.Javid, learned counsel for the parties.

2. Though the matter is listed for admission and the same is taken up for final disposal by the consent of the parties.

3. In respect of dishonored cheque of Rs.10,000/-, the accused was proceeded with criminal proceedings in CC No.1152/2023. Accused was ready to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards the amount covered under the dishonored cheque. But the complainant refused to receive the same and therefore, amount was deposited by the accused.

4. Later on, the learned trial judge without recording the plea proceeded with the case and convicted -3- NC: 2025:KHC-D:4418 CRL.RP No. 100439 of 2023 the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking enhancement of the sentence, the present revision petition came to be filed before this Court. Sri.Gourishankar Mot learned counsel for the revision petitioner contended that the order of the trial Magistrate, ordering only sum of Rs.10,000/- as fine amount as the cheque amount was only Rs.10,000/- is improper and therefore, sought for reasonable enhancement.

5. Sri.R.M.Javid opposes the revision grounds. He further contends that in a matter of this nature, question of granting further compensation would not arise as the accused was ready to pay the cheque amount which was refused by the complainant.

6. Taking note of the fact that the sum of Rs.10,000/- deposited by the accused has already been withdrawn by the revision petitioner enhancing the compensation amount in a sum of Rs.5,000/- would meet -4- NC: 2025:KHC-D:4418 CRL.RP No. 100439 of 2023 the ends of justice having regard to the fact that the transaction is admitted by the accused.

7. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER
(i) Revision Petition is allowed in part.
(ii) No interest as claimed by the complainant can be granted having regard to the scheme of the Section 138 of the NI Act.
(iii) However, sum of Rs.5,000/- is ordered as additional compensation which shall be payable by the accused to the revision petitioner on or before 30.03.2025.

Failing which accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

SD/-

(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HMB CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 24