Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 14, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Sahil Dahiya @ Tarun Dahiya vs The State Nct Of Delhi on 7 January, 2021

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 DEL 1160

Author: Yogesh Khanna

Bench: Yogesh Khanna

                                $~6
                                *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                %                                      Delivered on: 07th January, 2021
                                +     BAIL APPLN. 1436/2020

                                    SAHIL DAHIYA @ TARUN DAHIYA                ..... Petitioner
                                                  Through : Mr.Sunil Kumar Mittal and
                                                            Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advocates.
                                                  versus
                                    THE STATE NCT OF DELHI                    ..... Respondent
                                                  Through : Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State
                                                            with Inspector Neeraj Sharma,
                                                            Special Branch.
                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
                                YOGESH KHANNA, J. (Through Video Conferencing)
                                1.    This petition is filed under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code
                                1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr P C) for seeking regular bail in case FIR
                                No.207/2019 under Section 3/4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised
                                Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred as MCOCA) registered at police
                                station Special Cell, Delhi Police.

                                2.    The learned counsel for the petitioner argued petitioner herein has
                                been wrongly involved in MCOCA and though, perusal of the status
                                report filed by the State shows there are three FIRs against petitioner;
                                however, in FIR No.816/2014 under Section 302/34 IPC registered at
                                police station Rohini North, Delhi the petitioner was granted bail by this
                                Court per order dated 03.06.2015 and that time admittedly the accused
                                had no association with Parvesh Maan. As regards the FIR No.226/2018
                                registered at police station Ashok Vihar, it is alleged though charge sheet
                                has been filed against petitioner but there is no evidence of his
                                      Bail. Appln No.1436/2020                              Page 1 of 5

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:KAPIL
SHARMA
Signing Date:11.01.2021 16:52
                                 association with the organized gang of Parvesh Maan. Further in FIR
                                No. 291/2018 under Section 387 IPC PS K. N. Katju Marg, Delhi, the
                                petitioner is not involved. It is also argued Annexure-I of status report
                                reveals at least 40 persons associated to Parvesh Mann, then why the
                                accused of FIR No.226/2018 are singled out.

                                3.    It is further submitted whilst the petitioner was on interim bail in
                                case FIR No.226/2018 he was apprehended by the Delhi Police and was
                                involved in the present case FIR and arrested under the provisions of the
                                MCOCA. It is also alleged the petitioner on 04.06.2020 had retracted
                                from the confessional statement recorded under Section 18 of the
                                MCOCA and such letter is annexed as annexure A to this petition.

                                4.    However, the case of the prosecution is one Parvesh Maan @
                                Sagar the alleged the head of a syndicate, including the petitioner herein
                                is running an organized crime syndicate and is continuously engaged in
                                the unlawful activities for the purpose of pecuniary gain and other
                                benefits.   In the year 2018 the syndicate brutally murdered another
                                notorious gangster Suryapraksh @ Babloo in the area of police station
                                Ashok Vihar on 31.07.2018 to prove their supremacy of the gang in the
                                area of Outer Delhi for creating the havoc and terror, hence, the present
                                FIR was registered at the petitioner after obtaining the approval from the
                                competent authority.

                                5.    It is alleged in the last ten years, there are ten cases registered
                                against Parvesh Maan, being head of the syndicate. The three FIRs viz
                                FIR No.226/2018 under Section 302/34 IPC police station Ashok Vihar;
                                FIR No.282/2018 under Section 387 IPC police station K N Katju Marg;

                                      Bail. Appln No.1436/2020                             Page 2 of 5

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:KAPIL
SHARMA
Signing Date:11.01.2021 16:52
                                 and FIR No.291/2018 under Section 336/427 IPC and Section 25/27
                                Arms Act police station Maurya Enclave were registered against the gang
                                members. It is alleged only the accused of FIRs of 2018 have been made
                                accused in present FIR as these FIRs are recent and hence their
                                association with accused Parvesh Maan is recent.

                                6.    During the course of investigation, petitioner Sahil Dahiya was
                                arrested on 21.01.2020 and PC remand was taken on 29.01.2020.
                                Confessional statement of Sahil as per the provisions of Section 18 of
                                MCOCA was got recorded on 06.02.2020 by the competent authority i.e.
                                DCP and after that he was produced before the CMM on 06.02.2020.

                                7.    Later, four accused persons namely Ajay Mann, Sachin Mann,
                                Yudhveer Maan including syndicate Pravesh Maan were also arrested in
                                this case and their confessional statements were recorded as per the
                                provision of section 18 of MCOCA before the competent authority i.e.
                                DCP. Confessional statement of Syndicate/gangster Pravesh Maan was
                                got recorded by DCP on 01.04.2020 who disclosed about involvements
                                of his gang members, including of the petitioner Sahil Dahiya and others.
                                He stated he along with the petitioner Sahil Dahiya, Sachin Maan, Sonu
                                Maan @ Chand, Praveen @ Gaurav Tyagi committed murder of one
                                Surya Prakash @ Babloo in Ashok Vihar on 30.07.2018.

                                8.    As per record all the conditions for recording confessional
                                statement as laid down in Section 18 of the Act were duly complied
                                with. The record prima facie show no pressure was exerted upon the
                                accused and the confessional statement was made voluntarily by him and
                                he was told about his rights and briefed about the consequences before

                                      Bail. Appln No.1436/2020                            Page 3 of 5

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:KAPIL
SHARMA
Signing Date:11.01.2021 16:52
                                 recording his confessional statement by the DCP. He was also produced
                                before the CMM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi who asked him
                                whether he gave his statement voluntarily before DCP and his response
                                to the same has been recorded by learned CMM. The same process has
                                also been followed while recording statements of other co-accused. The
                                confessional statements are admissible as evidence per Section 18 of
                                MCOCA, in the present case FIR No.207/2019 under Section 3 & 4
                                MCOCA, PS Special Cell.

                                9.    Admittedly, petitioner Sahil Dahiya @ Tarun Dahiya is a co-
                                accused in FIR No.226/2018 under Section 302/201/120B/34IPC &
                                25/27/54/59 Arms Act PS Ashok Vihar, Delhi along with head of
                                syndicate Pravesh Maan and other associates of this case namely Sachin
                                Maan, Yudhveer @ Sonu Maan @ Chand and Gaurav Tyagi @ Praveen
                                in which one other gangster Babloo @ Ganja was murdered by firing to
                                establish the supremacy of Pravesh Maan gang in the area . It is further
                                pertinent to mention that in the charge sheet filed, it is specifically
                                mentioned that location of the mobile phone number 9873716004 used by
                                the petitioner Sahil Dahiya was found near the scene of crime and there
                                are 377 calls with syndicate Pravesh Maan in ten days. This prima facie
                                shows his association with Parvesh Maan.

                                10.   Though it is alleged there is no evidence of organized crime
                                against petitioner herein, but his association with Parvesh Maan is prima
                                facie established by CDRs between the two. Admittedly, 10 FIRs are
                                registered against Parvesh Maan too. It is too early to say how the trial
                                would shape in FIR No.226/2018 (supra) but it cannot be said there exists
                                no link between the gang and this applicant.
                                      Bail. Appln No.1436/2020                            Page 4 of 5

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:KAPIL
SHARMA
Signing Date:11.01.2021 16:52
                                 11.    The allegations that syndicate has been engaged in organized
                                crime by committing murder in the area for area domination, demanded
                                protection money from several persons, many of which has not even dare
                                to come forward to give complaint against the syndicate, cannot be
                                ignored at this stage.           The crime syndicate has used violence in
                                committing crimes as it evident from the fact that at time they have been
                                apprehended by the police illegal weapons have been recovered from
                                their possession. Murder of another gangster Surya Prakash @ Babloo
                                registered vide FIR No.226/2018 under Section 302/201/120B/34 IPC &
                                25/27 Arms Act, PS Ashok Vihar, allegedly, is done to gain/establish
                                supremacy of this crime syndicate in the area.

                                12.   The alleged retraction on 04.06.2020 of his confessional statement
                                does not appear to be bonafide because of long delay. The reason for
                                delay is not convincing either.

                                13.   In view of the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the bail cannot
                                be granted to the petitioner Sahil Dahiya at this stage, hence his
                                application is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s)
                                disposed of.

                                14.   Since, the matter is pending trial, needless to say the learned Trial
                                Court shall not be influenced from any of the observation above.



                                                                                   YOGESH KHANNA, J.

JANUARY 07, 2021 M Bail. Appln No.1436/2020 Page 5 of 5 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAPIL SHARMA Signing Date:11.01.2021 16:52