Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Meerut Development Authority, Delhi vs Addl. Cit, Meerut on 31 May, 2017

                                                                      1


            IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                [ DELHI BENCHES: "E" NEW DELHI ]

      BEFORE SHRI I. C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
      SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

           I.T. Appeal Nos. 4426, 4427 & 4428/Del/2014
          Assessment Years : 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2005-06

Meerut Development Authority,              Addl. Commissioner
C/o. Kapil Goel, Adv.;        Vs.          of Income Tax,
A-1/25, Sector : 15,                       Range : 1,
Rohini, Delhi - 110 085,                   Meerut.
     PAN : AAALM 0124 D
        (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

               Assessee by : Shri Mukul Gupta, Adv.,

             Department by : Shri Rajesh Kumar, Sr.D.R.

                      Date of Hearing : 31.05.2017
                 Date of Pronouncement : 31.05.2017

                             ORDER
PER I. C. SUDHIR, J.M. :

In these appeals the assessee has questioned levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, upheld by the ld. CIT.

2. At the outset of hearing, the ld. AR pointed out that the very subject matter of the levy of penalty i.e. the very additions made in 2 the assessment years under consideration against the assessee have already been deleted by the Tribunal in the case of present assessee itself vide order dated 29.09.2016 in ITA. Nos. 5455 to 5457/Del/2010 [assessment years 2003-04 to 2005-06, a copy of which has been made available to the Bench with copy to other side].

3. In view of above development, we hold that penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act in question does not survive. The same is accordingly directed to be deleted. The grounds of the appeal questioning the action of the ld. CIT (A) in sustaining the penalty are thus allowed.

4. In result, appeals are allowed.

5. The order is pronounced in the Open Court on : 31.05.2017.

       Sd/-                                             Sd/-
(PRASHANT MAHARISHI)                           ( I. C. SUDHIR )
 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                            JUDICIAL MEMBER


Dated : the 31st May, 2017.

*MEHTA*
                                                         3




Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1. Appellant;
2. Respondent;
3. CIT;
4. CIT (Appeals);
5. DR, ITAT, ND.

BY ORDER.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4 Date Draft dictated on 31.05.2017 Draft placed before author 31.05.2017 Draft proposed & placed before the second member.

Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Kept for pronouncement on File sent to the Bench Clerk Date on which file goes to the AR Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. Date of dispatch of Order.