Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Ram Laxmi Rattan vs State Of H.P. & Anr on 5 September, 2019

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                            CWP No. 1616 of 2019




                                                                        .

                                            Date of decision: 05.09.2019.


    Ram Laxmi Rattan                                         .....petitioner.





                                       Versus
    State of H.P. & Anr..                                  .....Respondents.





    Coram
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?1        No.



    For the Petitioner:                     Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

                                            Ajay Thakur, Advocate.

    For the Respondents:                    Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G. with
                                            Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Ms. Svaneel
                                            Jaswal, Dy. A.Gs. and Mr. Ram Lal
                                            Thakur, Asstt. A.G., for respondent



                                            No. 1.

                                            Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for
                                            respondent No. 2.






                     Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)

Arguments were heard and judgment was reserved in the pre lunch session. However, after the post lunch session, a request was made by learned Counsel for the petitioner for permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that the government has come up with some policy. Respondents have no objection to the request being allowed.

1

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes ::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 03:10:57 :::HCHP 2

2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been withdrawn, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

.


    05.09.2019                          (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
                                                  Judge





    (sanjeev)




                    r          to









                                          ::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 03:10:57 :::HCHP