Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bangalore District Court

State By Excise Inspector vs Ky Srikantha @ Kantharaju on 13 May, 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE V ADDL. C.M.M., BANGALORE CITY

    Dated this the Wednesday the 13th day of May 2015.

           PRESENT:   Sri B. VENKATESHA, B.Sc., L.L.B.,
                      V ADDL., C.M.M., BANGALORE CITY.

                      CC No.18062/2010


Complainant:           State by Excise Inspector,
                       Gandhinagar Sub-Division,
                       Bangalore.

                       (Rep., by Sr. APP., Bangalore)

                       Vs.
Accused:               1.KY Srikantha @ Kantharaju
                         S/o Yellappa, 29 Yrs.,
                         R/o No.41, Hanuman Nivasa,
                         Kuvempunagara, 3rd Cross,
                         8th Main, T Dasarahalli,
                         Bangalore-67.

                         And also at
                         No.21, Stud Farm, BG Road,
                         Kunigal Town, Tumkur District.

                       2.NM Satish @ Mohan Kumar
                         S/o Manjunatha, 28 Yrs.,
                         C/o MC Rajanna Building,
                         Opp., to KG Vidya Mandira,
                         7th Cross, Thigalarapalya,
                         Peenya II stage, Bangalore.

                         And also at
                         Kandali Grama and Post,
                         Hassan Taluk and District.
                                2
                                                  CC No.18062/2010

                       3.Chikkanna S/o Late Mayanna,
                         65 Yrs.,
                         R/a No.1253, 6th Cross,
                         Rama Mandira Road,
                         Kaveripura, Kamakshipalya,
                         Magadi Main Road, Bangalore.

                       A-4 Not traced.

                       5.M. Mocham
                         S/o Late Mariyasunnai, 52 Yrs.,
                         No.8/10, New No.4/8/105,
                         Nehrujinagara,
                         Ayyanur Shivakasi
                         Viruddhanagar, Tamil Nadu-626124.

                       6.M Vijayan S/o S Murugan,
                         Sri Rama Printers, No.56/57,
                         Swamypuram Colony,
                         Viruddhanagar, Tamil Nadu
                         and Also at
                         No.4/1730.56, House Colony,
                         Palapatti Road, Shivakasi(East) ,
                         Tamilnadu.

                       (Rep. by Sri MRV, Adv.,)

            JUDGMENT AS PER SEC. 355 Cr.P.C.

1. Serial number of the case       :     CC No.18062/2010
2. Date of the commission of
   the offence                     :     16.10.2009

3. The name of the complainant :         Sri HC Rajamallu
                                  3
                                                   CC No.18062/2010

4. Name of the accused persons
   and their parentage and residence:     As stated above.

5. The offence complained off        :U/s.11 13(1)(f) and 14
   are proved                        Punishable U/s.32, 38A and 43
                                     of KE Act 1965

6. The plea of the accused and       :    Pleaded not guilty and
    his examination                       denied the incriminating
                                          evidence.

7. The final order                   :    Acquitted.
8. The date of such order            :    13.05.2015
            THE BRIEF REASONS FOR FINAL ORDER:

     The prosecution's case in brief as set out in Cl. No.7 of

charge sheet is that the accused persons on 16.10.2009 during

night hours at about 8.30 p.m. in a Maruti car bearing reg No.CAY

4944, which was parked in front of residential bearing No.1253

belonging to Chikkanna S/o Late Mayanna, that situated at 6th

Cross, Rama Mandira Road, Kaveripura, Kamaksipalya, Magadi

Road, Bangalore, and in a room of the aforesaid house, found

storage of duplicate liquor manufacturing articles and the accused

No.5 and 6 got printed the duplicate Labels and supplied to

accused No.1 to 3 in the printing press of accused No.6. Thus,
                                 4
                                                 CC No.18062/2010

the accused persons have committed the aforesaid offences.

Hence, the charge sheet.

     2.The accused No.1 to 3, 5 and 6 are enlarged on bail.

After submission of this charge sheet, this court has taken

cognizance of the aforesaid offences against the aforesaid

accused persons.     Copies of the charge sheet have been

furnished to them as per Sec. 207 of Cr.P.C., Accused No.4 has

not been traced. Hence, this case is taken up against accused

No.1 to 3, 5 and 6 only. With no objection from the Counsel for

the accused, this Court framed charge for the aforesaid offences

against accused persons. The same read over and explained to

them in the language known to them. They pleaded not guilty.

The prosecution has examined CWs.10, 13, 1, 11,12, 6 and 14 as

PWs.1 to 7 and it has got marked fifteen documents as Ex.P-1 to

P-16. MO1 labels, corks and security slips etc are all got marked

for the prosecution. Statement of the accused as required U/sec.

313 of Cr.P.C has been recorded. The accused persons have

denied the incriminating evidence that appeared against them.
                                  5
                                                   CC No.18062/2010

They have submitted that they have no ence evidence. Heard the

arguments of both sides, perused evidence placed before the

court..

      3.This   case   has   been     registered   by   CW.13/PW.2

Govindaraju Excise Inspector, RPC Layout Range, Bangalore on

17.10.2009 on the ground that PW.2/CW.13 A Govindaraju,

PW.1/CW.10 HC Rajamallu and other staff Gangadhar, Shivanna,

Sommanna were on patrolling duty on the said date at about 7.00

p.m. on Magadi Road, and they found that one Maruti 800 Car

bearing registration No. CAY 4944 blue color is proceeding

towards residential house bearing No.1253 of the said area,

accused No.1 and 2 are in the said car, A-2 is driving the said car.

They inspected the said car and in two polythene bags found the

said car that consists 10,000 each Old Mank Rum and Original

Choice Whisky Labels and 10,000 security slips. They have not

possessed any license or permit to transport the said labels and

security slips. The accused No.1 and 2 told that they stored the

said labels in a residential house of accused No.3 Chikkanna and
                                    6
                                                    CC No.18062/2010

that they used to transport the said labels to different places.

Therefore, they inpsected the said house and found that there

exists 10,000 labels of different brands, Clarks and security slips.

The accused No.1 has possessed two mobile phones and cash of

Rs.5,000/-. The accused No.2 has possessed Sony Ericson Mobile

phone. Therefore, PW.2 has recovered all the said properties by

way of preparing mahazar marked as per Ex.P-2 in between 8.30

p.m. to 11.30 p.m. MO1 bears several labels, Clarks and security

slips.

         4. During the course of their oral evidence that recorded at

the time of their chief examination, PWs.1 and 2 have deposed

before this Court by way of reiterating the aforesaid facts. PW.3

Ravikumar is an attesting witness to the mahazar marked as per

Ex.P-1. He has identified his signature as per Ex.P-1c. During

the course of his oral evidence that recorded at the time of his

chief-examination he has deposed that on 16.10.2009 at about

8.15 p.m. he was proceeding towards his friends' house that

situated at Kamakshipalya, Magadi Road, Bangalore, at that time
                                     7
                                                 CC No.18062/2010

in 4-5 Jeeps the Excise officials came tot the said spot, they

requested him to follow in one jeep by saying that somebody

have illegally transporting several excise labels and caps.

Therefore, he accepted and traveled along with the Excise

Officials and they stopped one Maruti 800 blue color. In the said

car 2 polythene bags were found and in the said bags excise

labels, that used to stick over liquor bottles and further they

found caps of liquor bottles. The accused No-2 drove the said

car.   Thereafter, the excise Officials took him along with the

accused persons to one house of Kaveripura, Kamakshipalya. In

the said house also, the Excise Officials have seized several caps

and labels. At that time, one Prabhuswamy also present there at

that time. The said house is belongs to one Chikkanna and that

the said Chikkanna is also present at that time. Excise officials

have recovered the said labels, caps etc., by preparing mahazar

as per Ex.P-1. He put his signature on the said document. He

identified the said label as MO1.
                                  8
                                                     CC No.18062/2010

     5.PW.4 the then Excise Inspector of Anekal, Bangalore,

during the course of his oral evidence that recorded at the time of

his chief examination has deposed that on 11.02.2010 along with

the Superintendent Shivanagowda Patil, Inspectors' Shivakuamr,

Sandeep and Lokanath, went to Shivakasi Town of Tamilnadu and

visited door No.56-57 at about 3.30 p.m. In the said house

accused M Mocham was present at that time and one printing

press also found in the said house. Police officials of Shivakasi

Town also came to the said house and called the accused Vijayan

through telephone.    The said Vijayan came to the said house.

They didn't found labels in the said printing press, when they

searched. The accused Vijayan told to the Excise Officials that he

got printed the MO1 Labels and delivered the same to Mocham.

The said printing press is Srirama Printing Press. Excise Officer

Sandeep prepared the mahazar as per Ex.P-2 in the said printing

press.

     6.PW.5    Divyashree,    the    then   Excise     Inspector   of

Gandhinagar Sub-Division, Bangalore, during the course of her
                                 9
                                                 CC No.18062/2010

oral evidence that recorded at the time of her chief-examination

has deposed that on 26.10.2009 she obtained arrest warrant to

arrest the accused-Mocham, but she     unable to trace the said

accused.   Therefore, she handed over the case file to CW.14

Sandeep, Excise Inspector.

      7.PW.6 Thiruvenkataswamy, the then Head Constable of

Shivakasi Town east P.S., during the course of his oral evidence

that recorded at the time of his chief examination he has deposed

that Officer Shivanagowda Patil and other excise officers came to

Shivakasi Town on 11.02.2010 at about 3.15 p.m. At that time

he and another Head Constable Shankar Raj are all went to Sri

Rama Printers that situated at Swamypuram Colony of Shivakasi

town along with the Excise Officials of Karnataka. At that time

the Excise Officers have seized the printing and cutting machine

and have obtained their signature on Ex.P-2.       The accused

Mocham and Vijayan were also present in the said printing press

at that time.
                                  10
                                                       CC No.18062/2010

      8.PW.7      Sandeep   KJ   the   then   Excise     Inspector   of

Gandhinagar Sub-Division, Bangalore, during the course of his

oral evidence that recorded at the time of his chief examination

has deposed that he took the case file from Divya Shree on

1.2.2010.       He submitted Excise Labels to MCA Bangalore for

verification.     He received report marked as per Ex.P3 on

18.2.2010. Ex.P-3 discloses that the label marked as per MO1 is

of duplicate labels. He has also sent labels of Super Jack Whisky,

Original Choice, Gold Cup, Mcdowel Rum No.1, Golkanda Brandy,

Bagpiper Whisky, Highway Fine Whisky and Windsor Deluxe

Whisky to the concerned Distilleries and received the reports

marked as per Ex.P-4 to P15. Ex.P-3 to P-15 are also discloses

that the said labels are duplicate. He visited Shivakasi Town and

arrested accused No.5 Mocham on 9.2.2010 and as per the say of

accused No.5 he again visited Shivakasi on 11.02.2010 and at

about 3.30 p.m. went to Srirama Printers along with his senior

officers and police staff of Shivakasi P.S.,      He enquired the

accused Vijayan. He admitted that he printed the said labels and
                                           11
                                                                 CC No.18062/2010

supplied same to the accused No.5 Mocham. He prepared the

mahazar as per Ex.P2 and recovered the printing and cutting

machine. After completion of investigation he submitted the final

report against the accused persons.

        9. Except PW.3 other witnesses are all official witnesses.

Other independent panch witnesses are not examined to

corroborate the contents of Ex.P-1 and 2 and evidence of PW's.1,

2 and 7. The persons who inspected the said labels and submitted

report as per Ex.P-3 to P-15 have not been examined to

corroborate the case that the accused persons have printed the

said labels just to have unlawful gain. PW.3 during the course of

his cross-examination has deposed as under:-

          D PÁgÀ£Äß vÀqÉzÀÄ ¤°è¹zÀ eÁUÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £À£ÀVÃUÀ £É£À¦®è.   D ªÀÄ£É

£A§gï £À£ÀUÉ UÉÆwÛ®è.    ¤¦-1 gÀ°è K£ÀÃãÀÆ §gÉ¢zÉ JAzÀÄ £À£ÀVÃUÀ UÉÆwÛ®è.    D PÁj£À

£ÀA. £À£ÀUÉ UÉÆwÛ®è

         The aforesaid evidence of PW.3 itself defeats his evidence

that deposed by him during the course of his chief examination.

The said evidence also didn't corroborate the evidence of PWs.1
                                      12
                                                          CC No.18062/2010

and 2.    Therefore, I am of the opinion that it would be very

difficult to accept that the accused persons have created the said

labels. Hence, it would be very difficult to accept that the accused

persons have committed the said offences. Therefore, I am of the

opinion the prosecution has miserably failed to prove its case as

alleged against the accused persons beyond all reasonable doubt.

The accused persons are entitled for acquittal.

      10.In view of the aforesaid discussion, this court proceed to
pass the following:-
                                 ORDER

By acting U/s 248 (1) Cr.P.C. the aforesaid accused No.1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 are hereby acquitted of the offences U/s.11, 13(1)(f) and 14 punishable U/s.32, 38A and 43 of KE Act 1965.

They shall be set at liberty forthwith if they are not required to other cases. However, their bail and surety bonds are hereby extended for a period of 6 months from this date in view of Secs.437(A) of Cr.P.C., (Dictated to the Stenographer, transcript thereof is computerized and print out taken by him is verified and then pronounced by me in the open court on this the Wednesday the 13th day of May 2015.) (B.VENKATESHA) V Addl.C.M.M., B'lore.

13

CC No.18062/2010 ANNEXURE

1. LIST OF THE WITNESS EXAMINED FOR THE PROSECUTION PW.1 : HC Rajamallu PW.2 : A Govindaraju PW.3 : Ravikumar PW.4 : Chandrashekar PW.5 : Divyashree PW.6 : Thiruvenkataswamy PW.7 : KG Sandeep.

2. LIST OF THE DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR THE PROSECUTION Ex.P1 : Mahazar dt., 16.16.10.2009 Ex.P2 : Seizure Mahazar Ex.P3 to 15 : Reports Ex.P16 : Labels.

3. LIST OF THE WITNESS EXAMINED AND DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR THE DEFENCE:

NIL

4. LIST OF THE MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED FOR THE PROSECUTION:

MO1 Labels etc. (B.VENKATESHA) V Addl.C.M.M., B'lore.

14

CC No.18062/2010 13.05.2015 State by Sr. APP Accused No.1 to 3, 5 and 6 on bail Accused No.4 for Judgment.

Case called. Accused No.1 to 3, 5 and 6 Pt.,/abt., Judgement pronounced in the open Court as under vide separate Judgement kept in the file.

By acting U/s 248 (1) Cr.P.C. the aforesaid accused No.1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 are hereby acquitted of the offences U/s.11, 13(1)(f) and 14 punishable U/s.32, 38A and 43 of KE Act 1965.

They shall be set at liberty forthwith if they are not required to other cases. However, their bail and surety bonds are hereby extended for a period of 6 months from this date in view of Secs.437(A) of Cr.P.C., (B.VENKATESHA) V Addl.C.M.M., B'lore.

15 CC No.18062/2010