Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

L R Bhojwani @ Lakshmikanth vs State Of Karnataka on 25 February, 2015

Author: N.Ananda

Bench: N.Ananda

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 25TH FEBRUARY, 2015

                    :BEFORE:

        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND

      WRIT PETITION NO.47297/2014 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN

L.R.BHOJWANI @ LAKSHMIKANTH,
REWACHAND BHOJWANI,
S/O LATE REWACHAND BHOJWANI,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
R/AT NO.31-32, WONDERLAND,
NO.7, M.G. ROAD, PUNE 4110 001,
MAHARASHTRA STATE.                 ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI.M.R.C.MANOHAR, ADVOCATE)

AND

STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
B.S. AND F.C BELLARY ROAD,
GANGANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 032.
REPRESENTED BY
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR      ... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.HEGDE DEVARU GANAPATHI, ADVOCATE,
     FOR JADHAV LAW ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES.)

    THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W 482 OF CODE
OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE
                                       2

ORDER DTD:17.7.2014, IN SO FAR AS THE
PROCEEDINGS ABOUT        VALUATION     OF    THE
PROPERTY ARE CONCERNED AND ALL FURTHER
PROCESSES THERETO, IN SPL.C.C.NO.198/2003 BY THE
LEARNED XLVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE & SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES,
BANGALORE CITY (CCH-49) VIDE., ANNX-A, ETC..

    THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                                ORDER

Heard.

2. When the matter is taken-up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo reading as under:-

" MEMO REGARDING DEATH OF THE PETITIONER The petitioner in the above case has breathed his last on 31.10.2014, and hence the above petition stands abated. The respondent is producing herewith the death certificate of the petitioner issued by the Municipal Corporation of City of Pune, Government of Maharashtra.
Wherefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the above petition as having been abated, in the interest of justice and equity. "
3

3. In view of the death of sole petitioner (Accused No.2), this petition does not survive for consideration and the petition is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE KGR*