Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Union Of India vs Purushottam on 24 September, 2019

Author: S.C.Sharma

Bench: S.C.Sharma

  IN MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS.1001 TO 1023 ON THE BOARD
    DATED 24.09.2019 DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDER
Indore, dated 24.09.2019
           The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing of
identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office objection/default.
           In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the prescribed
time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in the first
instance.            The            Registrar     granted       sufficient         time        to        the
petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however, due to
non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter
was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted further time, by
passing common order on the earlier occasion.
           Inspite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules, second by the
Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure
the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in
terms       of       this   order,      SIX     WEEKS'      further   time    is     granted        to   the
petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office
objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time, failing
which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-
prosecution without further reference to the Court.
           Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-
service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned

matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing /scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

S. No. Cases as per Cause List No. Returnable Dates 1 1001 to 1020 11/11/19 2 1021 to 1023 13/11/19 (S. C. Sharma) Judge Ravi Digitally signed by Ravi Prakash Date: 2019.09.24 16:40:44 +05'30'