Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Somnath Bharat Ambawale And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 June, 2021

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

                               :1:                           19.BA-1942-21.odt


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

             CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1942 OF 2021

 1. Somnath Bharat Ambawale,
 2. Chetana Sandip Pawar, &
 3. Sushma Rahul Pawar.                       .... Applicants
             Versus
 The State of Maharashtra                     .... Respondent
                              -----
 Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate a/w. Meghdeep Oak,
 Varun Thokal, for the Applicants.
 Smt. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State.
                              -----

                                     CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

                                     DATE   : 14th JUNE, 2021
                                             [Through Video Conferencing]
 P.C. :

 1.               The Applicants are seeking their release on bail in

 connection with C.R.No.643/2020 registered at Satara Taluka

 police station, under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian

 Penal Code. Applicant No.1 was arrested on 31.12.2020 and

 other two applicants were arrested on 1.1.2021. Since then

 they are in custody. The investigation is over and the charge-

 sheet is filed.


 2.               Applicant No.2 is widow of the deceased Sandip

                                                                           1 of 8
  Deshmane(PS)




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                   ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                   :2:                          19.BA-1942-21.odt


 Pawar. Applicant No.1 is her brother and applicant No.3 is

 wife of brother of the deceased.


 3.               Heard Shri A.P. Mundargi, learned Senior Counsel

 for the Applicants and Smt. J.S. Lohokare, learned APP for the

 State.


 4.               The prosecution case is that the deceased Sandip

 Pawar was addicted to liquor. He had illicit relations with a

 woman at Kolav.               Therefore, he used to pick up frequent

 quarrels with applicant No.2, his brother and his mother. On

 27.12.2020, he was harassing applicant No.2 after consuming

 liquor. Applicant No.2 called applicant No.1 from Saudapur.

 When he questioned the deceased, there was quarrel. The

 deceased held applicant No.2 by her throat.                     That time,

 applicant No.1 intervened and beat the deceased. Applicants

 No.2 & 3 gave blows with wooden pieces on the deceased.

 The deceased felt uncomfortable in the night. Therefore he

 was taken to Command Hospital, Pune. But there he was

 declared dead.



                                                                             2 of 8




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                :3:                          19.BA-1942-21.odt


 5.               The FIR was lodged by applicant No.2 herself on

 29.12.2020, wherein she had given a different version, which

 according to the prosecution case is false. In her FIR, she has

 stated that on 27.12.2020, the deceased Sandip had come to

 their house under influence of liquor. He abused his mother

 and, therefore, his mother had given a complaint to Satara

 police station. In the evening, again the deceased came home

 under influence of liquor.          At that time, he had suffered

 injuries to his hands and legs.         Applicant No.2 asked him

 about the cause but he was unable to give any information.

 Thereafter he was taken to Command Hospital but he was

 declared dead. On this version, the FIR was lodged. The

 investigation was carried out and it transpired during

 investigation that applicants No.2 & 3 had assaulted the

 deceased with wooden pieces and applicant No.1 had also

 taken part in the assault.          On these allegations, all the

 applicants were arrested as mentioned earlier.


 6.               Shri Mundargi, learned Senior Counsel submitted

 that the final opinion as to cause of death is still not available.

                                                                          3 of 8




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                :4:                        19.BA-1942-21.odt


 The narration in the charge-sheet itself shows that the

 deceased was constantly harassing applicant No.2 and his

 other family members. On the fateful date, even his mother

 was abused by him for which a separate complaint was

 lodged. In the evening, applicant No.2 had called applicant

 No.1 for her help. At that time the deceased had almost tried

 to throttle her and, therefore, applicant No.1 had intervened

 and had beaten him with hands. In the meantime, applicants

 No.2 & 3 getting enraged gave blows with wooden pieces kept

 in the house as fuel. He submitted that applicant No.2 herself

 took the deceased to hospital and, therefore, there was no

 intention on their part to commit murder of the deceased. He

 submitted that there are statements of neighbouring witnesses

 where they have only spoken about the assault. The genesis of

 the incident is reflected in the statements of mother of the

 deceased and Rahul Pawar who is brother of the deceased.


 7.               Learned A.P.P. opposed   this application.           She

 submitted that there are eye witnesses to the incident and

 looking at the nature of the injuries, the offence punishable

                                                                        4 of 8




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                 :5:                               19.BA-1942-21.odt


 under Section 302 of IPC is made out.


 8.               I have considered these submissions. The post-

 mortem notes show that the deceased had suffered as many as

 21 injuries which were in the nature of bruises, abrasions,

 laceration and incised wound. Therefore, there is no doubt

 that he was assaulted and though the cause of death is not

 given; apparently he had died because of this assault. The

 question is whether the applicants had requisite intention

 falling within the definition of murder. Though this question

 will have to be finally decided during the trial, at this stage,

 there are indications that their intention was not to commit

 his murder, which is reflected from various statements of eye

 witnesses.


 9.               As     far   as     independent    eye      witnesses         are

 concerned, there are statements of neighbours Dattatraya

 Pawar, Arun Pawar, Sujit Pawar, Dattatraya Jadhav and Vinod

 Pawar.       All of them have stated that at about 8:00 p.m. on

 27.12.2020, quarrel was going on in the house of the

 deceased. He was being assaulted by applicants No.2 & 3 with
                                                                                5 of 8




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                        ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                :6:                          19.BA-1942-21.odt


 wooden sticks and applicant No.1 was beating him with his

 hands. The important statement would be that of mother of

 the deceased, who had seen the incident right from the

 inception. She has stated that in the morning the deceased

 had assaulted this witness i.e. his own mother for which a

 complaint was made to the police station. In the evening the

 deceased had returned home under influence of liquor. He

 started abusing and assaulting applicant No.2. Applicant No.3

 tried to intervene. At that time, applicant No.1 also came to

 their house.          He started beating the deceased.        Thereafter

 applicants No.2 & 3 started giving blows with wooden pieces

 which were in the house. This statement is important which

 shows genesis of the incident.         Significantly this statement

 specifically mentions that the deceased had started beating

 applicant No.2 and he had held her by throat.


 .                The sequence does indicate that applicant No.2

 and others could be under the real apprehension of serious

 injuries to applicant No.2. In that case, applicant No.1 has

 significantly given beating only with his hands. It is the two

                                                                          6 of 8




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                :7:                            19.BA-1942-21.odt


 ladies i.e. applicants No.2 & 3 who have beaten the deceased

 with wooden sticks.


 10.              In his statement, Rahul Pawar brother of the

 deceased, has stated that after the quarrel                 between the

 deceased and applicants, the deceased was sleeping in the

 hall. But in the night he felt breathless. Therefore the family

 members got scared. Applicant No.2 suggested that he should

 be removed to Command Hospital because his treatment was

 going on there. Thereafter they arranged for a car and the

 deceased was immediately taken to Command Hospital. This

 shows that the applicants have not beaten the deceased to

 death. He was sleeping after the assault, but, in the night his

 condition deteriorated              and seeing this the applicants

 immediately arranged to remove him to the hospital. In fact

 applicant no.2 suggested that he should be taken to Command

 Hospital where his treatment was already going on. This

 shows that the applicants may not have entertained intention

 to commit murder of the deceased.                      There was no

 premeditation or preparation to commit the assault. In this

                                                                            7 of 8




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::
                                    :8:                            19.BA-1942-21.odt


 background, lenient view can be taken only for consideration

 of bail. Applicant No.1 is not attributed any role with any

 weapon. Other two applicants are ladies and the assault has

 taken place in the background mentioned hereinabove.


 11.                    In this view of the matter, bail can be granted to

 all the applicants. Therefore, their detention in custody for

 the entire period of trial is not necessary. Hence the following

 order :

                                         ORDER

(i) In connection with C.R.No.643/2020 registered at Satara Taluka police station, the applicants are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing PR bonds in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) each with one or two sureties each in the like amount.

(ii) The Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS) 8 of 8 ::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2021 21:57:24 :::