Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri D Kiran Kumar vs M/S Purvis Kids Jungle on 2 November, 2023

                                               -1-
                                                           NC: 2023:KHC:38999
                                                       CRL.A No. 181 of 2019




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

                                            BEFORE

                            THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

                             CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 181 OF 2019 (A)

                   BETWEEN:

                         SRI D KIRAN KUMAR
                         S/O C DAVID
                         AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
                         DIRECTOR
                         M/S V K APPARALES PVT LTD.,
                         NO.72, SW/51, DODDABALLAPUR
                         INTEGRATED TEXTILE PARK LTD.,
                         PHASE-II, DODDABALLAPURA
                         BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203.
                                                                 ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. BALARAJ A C.,ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

Digitally signed   1.    M/S PURVIS KIDS JUNGLE
by SANDHYA S             A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN,
Location: High           HAVING OFFICE AT NO.3,
Court of
Karnataka                NO.5, RAMAIAH PUTTAMMA COMPLEX,
                         JAYANTHI NAGAR ROAD
                         NEAR RAGHAVENDRA CIRCLE,
                         RAMAMURTHYNAGAR
                         BENGALURU - 560 016
                         REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR

                   2.    ASHWINI
                         MAJOR
                         PROPRIETOR,
                         M/S PURVIS KIDS JUNGLE
                         A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN,
                         HAVING OFFICE AT NO.3,
                                   -2-
                                                 NC: 2023:KHC:38999
                                              CRL.A No. 181 of 2019




     NO.5, RAMAIAH PUTTAMMA COMPLEX,
     JAYANTHI NAGAR ROAD,
     NEAR RAGHAVENDRA CIRCLE,
     RAMAMURTHYNAGAR,
     BENGALURU - 560 016.
                                                     ...RESPONDENTS
(V/o DT. 02/11/2023 NOTICE TO R1 & R2 D/W)

     CRL.A. FILED U/S 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE IMPUGNED ORDER AND JUDGMENT DATED 11.07.2017
PASSED BY THE LVIII A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU IN
C.C.NO.50258/2015, AND ORDER OF RESTORING THE ABOVE
COMPLAINT ON THE FILE OF THE COURT BELOW FOR
PROVIDING A FAIR AND REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO THE
APPELLANT FOR PROCEEDINGS WITH THE COMPLAINT FILED
BY HIM AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS, -ACQUITTING THE
RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 ON N.I
ACT.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                            JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for appellant.

2. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 11.07.2017 passed by the LVIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in CC No.50258/2015.

3. The trial Court dismissed the case for non- prosecution and this case is not disposed of on merits. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, notice to respondent is dispensed, appeal is admitted and taken up for final disposal.

-3-

NC: 2023:KHC:38999 CRL.A No. 181 of 2019

4. Brief facts of the case :

Appellant/Complainant had filed a complaint against the accused persons under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for dishonour of cheque, which is punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial Court has taken cognizance and a case came to be registered in CC No.50258/2015 on the file of XIV Addl. C.M.M., Bengaluru. Learned Magistrate on 11.07.2017 dismissed the said case for non-prosecution, which reads as under:
"Accused prt. Complainant abst no tendered for cross. Passed over at 3.00 p.m. sd/- 11/7 Again called at 4.00 PM. Accused present. PW-1 absent. No representation. Inspite of sufficient time PW-1 not tendered for cross. Cost was also imposed. It seems complainant not interested in prosecution of case, no grounds to adjourn the case. Thus evidence of PW1 discarded.
Complaint is dismissed. Accused acquitted U/s.138 of NI Act. Bail bonds of accused and surety cancelled."

5. The order sheet of the trial Court reveals that the Complainant had already adduced evidence in part as PW1, but he has not appeared for cross-examination. Hence, trial Court -4- NC: 2023:KHC:38999 CRL.A No. 181 of 2019 has dismissed the case. Further, the order sheet of the trial Court reveals that even the accused persons also not appeared before the Court. When the accused persons failed to appear before the Court, it is the duty of the Court to secure the presence of the accused person by issuing NBW to the accused persons for their presence and also notice to surety. But, in the present case the trial Court cancelled the bail bonds of the accused as well as surety, which is not permissible under law. The impugned order passed by the trial Court is illegal and not sustainable in law, which is contrary to the provisions Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order:

ORDER
(i) The appeal is allowed.
(ii) The order dated 11.07.2017 passed by the LVIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in CC No.50258/2015, is set aside.
(iii) The CC No.50258/2015 is restored to its original file on the file of the LVIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. -5-

NC: 2023:KHC:38999 CRL.A No. 181 of 2019

(iv) The Appellant/Complainant is directed to appear before the trial Court on 16.11.2023 without further notice.

(v) Trial Court is directed to secure the presence of the accused and proceed with the case in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

(vi) Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court.

Sd/-

JUDGE VK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4