Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

Mohan Lal Sharma vs State Of Chhattisgarh 14 Wps/920/2019 ... on 13 February, 2019

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                             1

                                                                                 NAFR
                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                   WPS No. 898 of 2019


             Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Late Shri Vishnu Prasad Sharama, Aged
             About 75 Years, R/o Station Para Ward No.13, Rajnandgaon, District-
             Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                ---- Petitioner
                                           Versus
         1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Urban
            Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital
            Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
         2. Directorate, Urban Administration And Development, Through, The
            Director, Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan,
            Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur,
            Chhattisgarh.
         3. Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, Through Its Commissioner,
            Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon,
            Chhattisgarh.
                                                      ---Respondents

For petitioner : Shri Shiv Sahu, Advocate For State : Shri Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G. For respondent No.3 : Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/02/2019

1. The dispute raised by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is of non-granting interest on G.P.F. at par with what has been paid to the Government Employees.

2. The counsel for the parties fairly submit that, the issue involved in the case stands squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in two of the Writ Petitions decided on 04/08/2017 i.e. in WPS No. 3458/2007 and WPS No. 4640/1999.

3. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the parties, the present Writ Petition also deserves to be and is accordingly allowed in 2 terms of the order passed by this Court in the afore mentioned two Writ Petitions decided on 04/08/2017.

4. Let a copy of the judgment passed in the said two Writ Petitions be also made part of the record of this Writ Petition.

5. The Writ Petition stands allowed and disposed off in similar terms.

Sd/-

                                                          (P. Sam Koshy)
Jyotij                                                        JUDGE