Karnataka High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Mphasis Bfl Ltd on 1 March, 2012
Bench: N.Kumar, Ravi Malimath
fiéTfiE%fi§%§CGURT£E7K§RNA?éK$;§FB%N§ALGRE EEATED "§'%~éES THE :3'? my SF FVZARQR 2312 PRESERT ma ?:~%$§*£'5LE §~'ER.}i,j$TZCE§*£w.%€L§f'~€§%g§ "4 % Am V V ' THE HQWELE %4?;,3u$T::§"**:2.5v: :*~»>':,a L;v;r»<1V;%;5:f_:§§"~i..;""-~ ETA.NG;.5SQ @§;é;sae'%A%.F BETVVEEN:
L M The C@mmEssisr:'sr;__Qf 1';:'2'{:'$§'r;§é;w";.§'1ax;?=--.V V {;IR,Bu§1§in§; ;Q'ué3§:':s §{.ga:;1g Barsgatere .
The Assi5:3§i"5._§i::s::'t";;f2i2_§.s:§§::s3:ée"Q/f..,:;f':r:eme Tax, Cis"::ie:v':2{3<};.é:._EZ.8:;§Ec§_§;é*gé,T _ Queens; Ragga ' * _ ' §a;':ga!@3:*e, = ..,£??ELL,é§éT§ {S}: 321 §%E,_T?2§:L;E'::;§V§e:3%é.; Aéivéétatéé %'v€';"s§ fig E; 3:: , §§ §a§:3Ei3§fV%:, %4%:3_?s§»:§_r'~:€?a§:: Rgaéf 'A 535% ?i§:§§"ga:%a?a%;a§éa 5%? ' '--§{i§--'z5G{f8i:&;'S} ' ».§<srarf:.§r:g§§..:sg L , §'§§fi§§§€§'§"€ §£§7§ G§E§ ...?;ES§§G§'a§$E§'é"§' ?«'§j§,%<§a§ & ?ai€%«§ge;
$¥¥$$ g/V $25
3. Ever: siizgxégége, ihe case €333 aaritifiéa the éecégiez": ef this Cszsrt 3: {ha cage 3:' C§mmi§5£a:2$?<. _:§;f" ~.._ Incgmgwfgz arm' anether vs; M/'5,B,%EHfi:£. Sef£w§r§.-%ié§;;; :;?« 'V' V 52% :1iQ.3:<§§,52§§5 arm' CG!?:'}'EC€8{'f mafitgrs cz'isg3'e;§'s1i:§:"a?ff"%3;? _ 355* Janaary 233% Therefaref the agfieai;%'a§:§§:S«:L§2_é':?é*.§§.
F91' éhe afwesaié 5e§so;ésL«L_ é,:%s0§ :*§1jé"va ;3§é1;§E Es désmésgeé, ..««.aa=;s._.9;.,