Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ashmeen Kaur @ Jareena Begum And ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 16 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
112
CRWP-2587-2021
Date of decision: 16.03.2021
Ashmeen Kaur @ Jareena Begum and another .....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Present : Mrs. Kanwal S. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J (ORAL)
The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
The petitioners, claiming themselves to be aged about 31 and 30 years respectively, have approached this Court seeking protection of their life and liberty on the averments that petitioner No.1, a Muslim girl after converting to Sikhism, performed marriage with petitioner No.2 on 12.03.2021 at Gurudwara Dashmesh Pita Pathsahi Dasvi (Regd.), Village Singha Devi, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali, as per Sikh rites and ceremonies against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8 and the petitioners are apprehending threat to their life and liberty at their instance.
In support of the averments made in the petition, the petitioners have also enclosed photographs taken at the time of their marriage.
Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. P.S. Walia, Asstt. AG, Punjab has appeared and accepted notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 18-03-2021 00:38:37 ::: CRWP-2587-2021 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners states that representation dated 12.03.2021 (Annexure P-6) was made to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar seeking necessary protection but no action has been taken so far in the matter and prays for issuance of direction in this regard.
Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given.
Without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate action for protection of their life and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances.
However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against petitioner No.2, then nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking of appropriate action by the police authorities against him in respect thereof in accordance with law.
The Registry of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar for requisite compliance.
16.03.2021 (ARUN KUMAR TYAGI)
kothiyal JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 18-03-2021 00:38:37 :::