Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Pawan Kumar vs The Commissioner And Director on 21 April, 2021

Author: V.Bharathidasan

Bench: V.Bharathidasan

                                                                            W.P.No.9907 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 21.04.2021

                                                      CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

                                               W.P.No.9907 of 2021
                                                       and
                                              W.M.P. No.10524 of 2021

                     S.Pawan Kumar,
                     S/o. Shanthilal Jain                               ... Petitioner

                                                   Versus

                     1. The Commissioner and Director
                         of Survey and Settlement,
                        Survey House, Chepauk,
                        Chennai-600 005.

                     2. The Settlement Officer,
                        O/o. The Commissioner and
                         Director of Survey and Settlement,
                        Survey House, Chepauk,
                        Chennai-600 005.

                     3. The Assistant Settlement Officer,
                         (North),
                        O/o. Director of Survey and Settlement,
                        Survey House, Chepauk,
                        Chennai-600 005.




                     1/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                       W.P.No.9907 of 2021



                     4. The Special Tahsildar,
                        Town Survey,
                        Revenue Follows up Work,
                        Avadi-600 071.

                     5. P.Jayachandran
                        S/o. Ramasubbu

                     6. M.Ulaganathan
                        S/o. K.Mari

                     7. G.Vivekanandan,
                        S/o. Ganapathy Gramani

                     8. R.Rajalakshmi
                        W/o. Ramachandran

                     9. S. Jayashankar,
                        S/o. Sundaramurthy

                     10. S.Om Prakash,
                         S/o. Sugunasekaran

                     11. G.Inbasekaran,
                         S/o. Late Ganapathy Gramani

                     12. G.Deviramani,
                         W/o. Pasupathy

                     13. P.G.Babu,
                         S/o. Late Ganapathy Gramani

                     14. V.Amarajothi,
                         S/o. Vijayarangan


                     2/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                         W.P.No.9907 of 2021



                     15. Devasundari,
                         W/o. Sivakumar

                     16. D.Meerabai,
                         W/o. Dhamodharan

                     17. P.G.Bhaskar
                         S/o. Late Ganapathy Gramani

                     18. M.Vasanthi,
                         W/o. Muthukumaran

                     19. P.G.Sivakumar,
                         S/o. Ganapathy Gramani

                     20. T.Shanthi,
                         S/o. Late Thirugnanam Gramani

                     21. S.Shankari,
                         W/o. Late Shanmuga Gramani

                     22. C.S.Rajesh
                         S/o. Late Subramani

                     23. V.Amrudha,
                         W/o. M.Vishvanathan

                     24. T.Gowri,
                         D/o. Late Thiyagaraja Gramani

                     25. T.Iyappan,
                         S/o. Late Thiyagaraja Gramani




                     3/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                          W.P.No.9907 of 2021



                     26. T.Devi,
                         D/o. Late Thiyagaraja Gramani

                     27. S.Dinesh,
                         S/o. R.Sekar                                                 ... Respondents


                     PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

                     India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 4th

                     respondent herein from conducting the enquiry in pursuance to his

                     proceedings dated 30.11.2020 in Na.Ka.95/2020 till the disposal of the Civil

                     Suits in O.S.No.89/2020, 91/2020 and 93/2020 pending before the District

                     Munsif Court, Poonamallee.

                               For Petitioner               : Mr.Murali,
                                                              for My Lord Law Associates

                               For Respondents              : Mr.T.M.Pappiah,
                                                              Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4


                                                             ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction forbearing the 4th respondent herein from conducting the enquiry regarding transfer of patta till the disposal of civil suits filed by the petitioner. 4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.9907 of 2021

2. In view of the order is going to be passed in the present Writ Petition, which will not prejudice the interest of the respondents 5 to 27, notice to the respondents 5 to 27 are dispensed with.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the owner of property in various Survey Nos. 103/1, 89/2A, 89/3, 89/4, 89/5, 89/6 and 91/3, totally an extent of Ac. 3.87 cents in Paleripattu Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District and he has purchased the same from various persons. Subsequently, he is taking steps to develop the property. Recently, the respondents 8 to 26 claiming right over the property given power of attorney in favour of respondents 5 to 7 and they have entered into various sale agreements with the 27th respondent. Now, they are taking steps to transfer the property. In the said circumstances, the petitioner said to have filed Civil Suits in O.S. Nos.89, 91 and 93 of 2020 seeking to declare the power of attorney as well as sale agreement as null and void on the file of District Munsif Court, Poonamallee and the suits are pending. In the meanwhile, the 5th and 7th respondents, power of attorney holders, have 5/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.9907 of 2021 approached the 4th respondent Tahsildar seeking for transfer of patta and filed the application. Considering the application, the 4th respondent Tahsildar has also sent a notice of enquiry to the petitioner, for which, the petitioner appeared for enquiry and raised his objections and also said to have produced documents to establish his title. Now, the enquiry is pending. In the meantime, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for restraining the 4th respondent Tashildar from conducting any enquiry till the disposal of civil suits.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has purchased the property from valid title holders and the respondents 8 to 6, absolutely, have no right over the property. They have fraudulently executed a power of attorney in favour of respondents 5 to 7 and based on that, they have also entered into sale agreement with the 27th respondent. Subsequently, the petitioner has filed civil suits on the file of District Munsif Court, Poonamallee and until the suit is disposed of, the 4th Respondent Tahsildar cannot pass any orders in the patta proceedings. 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.9907 of 2021

5. I am unable to appreciate the contention of the petitioner. Admittedly, on a application filed by the rival claimants, the enquiry is pending, the petitioner has also appeared for enquiry, and raised his objection and the enquiry is still pending. The petitioner also subjecting himself to the jurisdiction of Tahsildar and appeared for enquiry. The pendency of the civil suit is not a ground to prevent the statutory authority from discharging his duties. Hence, I find no merit in the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. However, the 4th Respondent Tahsildar is directed to complete the enquiry and pass suitable orders on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity to the petitioner as well as respondents 5 to 27, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

21.04.2021 rpp 7/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.9907 of 2021 To

1. The Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2. The Settlement Officer, O/o. The Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

3. The Assistant Settlement Officer, (North), O/o. Director of Survey and Settlement, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

4. The Special Tahsildar, Town Survey, Revenue Follows up Work, Avadi-600 071.

8/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.9907 of 2021 V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.

rpp W.P.No.9907 of 2021 and W.M.P. No. 10524 of 2021 21.04.2021 9/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/