Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Krishnan vs The District Revenue Officer on 10 April, 2019

Author: K.Ravichandrabaabu

Bench: K.Ravichandrabaabu

                                                          1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 10.04.2019

                                                        CORAM

                                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

                                                 W.P.No.10905 of 2019

                      S.Krishnan                                                   ...Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                      1. The District Revenue Officer
                         Krishnagiri - 635 115
                         Krishnagiri District.

                      2. The Revenue Divisional Officer
                         Office of the RDO
                         Hosur - 635 109.

                      3. The Tahsildar
                         Taluk Office
                         Shoolagiri - 635 117
                         Krishnagiri District.                                ...Respondents


                            Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to
                      consider the petitioner's representations dated 19.12.2018 and
                      30.03.2019 for rectification of errors crept in the Revenue records
                      with regard to the lands measuring to an extent of 0.61.00 Hectare in
                      Survey   No.128/4-0.06.00      Hectare,   in   Survey     No.130/1-0.27.00
                      Hectare, in Survey No.134/1-0.4.00 Hectare, in Survey No.135/1-



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                            2

                      0.24.00 Hectare, situated in Tiyaranadurgam Village, Shoolagiri Taluk,
                      Krishnagiri District and issue computerized Patta, Chitta and Village 'A'
                      Register extract to the petitioner.
                                  For Petitioner  :             Mr.Bharath Kumar R.
                                  For Respondents :             Mr.S.Soundararajan
                                                                Government Advocate

                                                  O R D E R

Mr.S.Soundararajan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, this main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider his representation dated 19.12.2018, followed by a reminder dated 30.03.2019, wherein and whereby, he sought for rectification of errors crept in the Revenue records with regard to the lands measuring to an extent of 0.61.00 Hectare in Survey No.128/4- 0.06.00 Hectare, in Survey No.130/1-0.27.00 Hectare, in Survey No.134/1-0.4.00 Hectare, in Survey No.135/1-0.24.00 Hectare, situated in Tiyaranadurgam Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue computerized Patta, Chitta and Village 'A' Register extract to the petitioner.

http://www.judis.nic.in 3

3. It is stated that the petitioner's family is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said lands for decades together. It is further stated that in the Revenue records, the above said lands have been wrongly classified as "Anatheenam". Hence, the petitioner sent a representation dated 19.12.2018, followed by a reminder dated 30.03.2019, requesting the respondents to rectify the errors crept in the Revenue records and issue computerized patta and chitta in his favour. However, the said representations have not been considered by the respondents so far. Hence, the present writ petition is filed before this Court.

4. Heard both sides.

5. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the 1st respondent to consider and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the http://www.judis.nic.in 4 K.RAVICHANDRABAABU.,J.

mk petitioner dated 19.12.2018, followed by a reminder dated 30.03.2019 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner and other interested parties, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the 1st respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

10.04.2019 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet :Yes/No mk To

1. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri - 635 115 Krishnagiri District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the RDO Hosur - 635 109.

3. The Tahsildar Taluk Office Shoolagiri - 635 117 Krishnagiri District.

W.P.No.10905 of 2019 http://www.judis.nic.in