Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Gujarat High Court

State Of Gujarat vs Shree Kutch Vijay Saw Mill on 8 June, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, A.J. Shastri

                  O/OJCA/219/2016                                                  ORDER



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) NO. 219 of 2016
                                                  In
                                    TAX APPEAL NO. 452 of 2016
                                                With
                                    TAX APPEAL NO. 452 of 2016
                                                With
                          CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) NO. 241 of 2016
                                                  In
                                    TAX APPEAL NO. 452 of 2016
         ==========================================================
                          STATE OF GUJARAT....Applicant(s)
                                      Versus
                     SHREE KUTCH VIJAY SAW MILL....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================
          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
                            Date : 08/06/2016
                                      COMMON ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. This   application   is   filed   by   the   State   seeking  condonation of delay of 274 days in filing a Tax Appeal.  In the process of hearing the Civil Application, we also  cursorily looked at the orders and the challenge in the  main Tax Appeal.  We noticed  that the amount of disputed  tax   inclusive   of   penalty   is   extremely   small.     Only   on  this ground, we terminate all present proceedings.  

2. In the result Civil Application for delay as well  as Tax Appeal alongwith Civil Application for stay are  all dismissed.


                                                                           (AKIL KURESHI, J.)




                                              Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC                                     Page 1 of 2      Created On Fri Jun 10 01:41:37 IST 2016
                  O/OJCA/219/2016                                           ORDER



                                                                     (A.J. SHASTRI, J.)
         ANKIT




                                      Page 2 of 2

HC-NIC                             Page 2 of 2      Created On Fri Jun 10 01:41:37 IST 2016