Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajdeep Sharma vs State Of Punjab on 11 May, 2023

Author: Manjari Nehru Kaul

Bench: Manjari Nehru Kaul

                                                     Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:067978




                                                            2023:PHHC:067978

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH
208
                                                    CRM-M-4781-2023
                                            Date of decision: 11.05.2023

Rajdeep Sharma                                                  .....Petitioner

                                  Versus

State of Punjab                                               .....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present :    Mr. Bipan Ghai, Sr. Advocate with
             Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

             Mr. Ramdeep Partap Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

             Mr. Aayush Arora, Advocate
             for the complainant.

                                   ****

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.213 dated 21.12.2022 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC registered at Police Station City Samana, District Patiala.

Vide order dated 16.03.2023 the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 16.03.2023, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. It has also been reiterated that the parties have amicably settled all their disputes pertaining to the agreement to sell qua the house in question.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 13-05-2023 05:08:17 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:067978 2023:PHHC:067978 CRM-M-4781-2023 -2- with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation much less for his custodial interrogation.

Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not oppose the prayer made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 16.03.2023, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.


11.05.2023                                  (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)
Vinay                                              JUDGE

             Whether speaking/reasoned          :     Yes/No
             Whether reportable                 :     Yes/No




Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:067978 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 13-05-2023 05:08:18 :::