Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Manoj Chauhan vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors on 25 November, 2019

Bench: Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Anoop Chitkara

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.




                                                                   .
                                    CMPMO No. 788 of 2019





                         Date of decision: November 25, 2019.





    Manoj Chauhan.                              ......Petitioner.
                              Versus
    State of Himachal Pradesh & ors.                 .....Respondents.



    Coram                   r        to
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.

    Whether approved for reporting? 1


    For the petitioner        :     Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate.

    For the respondents       :     Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu
                                    Mishra, Addl. AGs with Mr. Manoj
                                    Bagga, Asstt. AG for respondents No.




                                    1 to 3.





    Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge (Oral)

Notice. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Additional Advocate General appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

2. The limited prayer with which the petitioner has approached this Court is a direction sought to be passed against the respondents to transfer the record of O.A. No. 2637 of 2019, which was filed and pending in the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? yes.

::: Downloaded on - 26/11/2019 20:24:18 :::HCHP 2

Administrative Tribunal, the day when the same abolished, to the files of this Court.

.

3. Heard. Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Additional Advocate General for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

4. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 4 to transfer the record of O.A. No. 2637 of 2019 to this Court within a week on the receipt of copy of this judgment.

(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge.




                                         (Anoop Chitkara),
    November 25, 2019,                         Judge.




         ( vs)






                                              ::: Downloaded on - 26/11/2019 20:24:18 :::HCHP