Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 1]

Jharkhand High Court

Ram Bhadra Singh @ Ram Bharosh Singh vs State Of Jharkhand on 20 June, 2011

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                A. B. A. No. 136  of 2011
                 Ram Bhadra Singh @ Ram Bharosh Singh.....Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 State of Jharkhand                          .........Opposite Party
                                                                       ­­­­­­­­­­
                   CORAM:                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR
                                                                       ­­­­­­­­­
                          For the Petitioner      : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Adv.
                          For the State           : APP.
                                               ­­­­­­­­­­
6/20.6.2011

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 

The petitioner, who is an accused for offence under Sections 33/41/42/52  of Indian Forest Act, prays for anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest in connection  with G ( F) Case No. 273 of 2010.

Learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   submitted   that   the   petitioner   is   the  owner   of   the   truck   and   the   coal   was   being   transported   under   valid   and   genuine  documents, hence he prays for anticipatory bail. 

            Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

In   that   view   of   the   matter,   the   above­named   petitioner   is   directed   to  surrender before the court below within two weeks from today, and in the event of his  surrender,   he   shall   be   released   on   anticipatory   bail   on   furnishing   bail   bond   of   Rs.  10,000/­   (   rupees   ten   thousand)   with   two   sureties   of   the   like   amount   each   to   the  satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in connection with G. ( F) Case No.  273 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and  further conditions  that (i) one of the bailors would be local resident having property  within the jurisdiction of the Court (ii) the petitioner will present before the Court below  on each and every date till the conclusion of the trial, otherwise his bail bond shall stand  cancelled.  

                                                                                                         (Pradeep Kumar, J.) jk