Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Arunkumar Narayanachar Thattar vs Union Of India on 21 February, 2023

Author: Prasanna B. Varale

Bench: Prasanna B. Varale

                                            -1-
                                                        WP No. 42 of 2023




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

                                         PRESENT

                  THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE

                                            AND

                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 42 OF 2023 (T-RES-PIL)


                 BETWEEN:

                 ARUNKUMAR NARAYANACHAR THATTAR
                 AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
                 POSTAL ADDRESS: NO. H304, 3RD FLOOR,
                 H BLOCK, GAANA RIDDHI APARTMENT,
                 NAGADEVANAHALLI,
                 BANGALORE-560 056.

                                                             ...PETITIONER
Digitally
signed by R      (BY SRI. ARUNKUMAR N. T., PETITIONER IN PERSON)
DEEPA
Location: High
Court of         AND:
Karnataka
                 1.    UNION OF INDIA
                       REP. BY ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA,
                       KARNATAKA HIGH COURT PREMISES,
                       DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                       BANGALORE-560 001.

                 2.    THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO PRIME MINISTER
                       PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE,
                       ROOM NO. 148-A, SOUTH BLOCK,
                       NEW DELHI-110 011.
                           -2-
                                       WP No. 42 of 2023




3.   FINANCE MINISTER
     ROOM NO. 134, NORTH BLOCK,
     NEW DELHI-110 001

4.   PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO FM
     ROOM NO. 136-A,
     NORTH BLOCK,
     NEW DELHI-110 001

5.   THE SECRETARY
     DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
     MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
     ROOM NO. 128-A, NORTH BLOCK,
     NEW DELHI-110 001.

6.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     REP. BY ADVOCATE GENERAL OF KARNATAKA,
     KARNATAKA HIGH COURT PREMISES,
     DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
     BANGALORE-560 001.

7.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
     VIDHANA SOUDHA,
     AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
     BANGALORE-560 001.

8.   CHIEF SECRETARIES OF ALL THE STATES
     THROUGH ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA,
     KARNATAKA HIGH COURT PREMISES,
     DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
     BANGALORE-560 001.

9.   THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY
     TO THE FINANCE MINISTER
     OF THE STATES
     THROUGH ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA,
     KARNATAKA HIGH COURT PREMISES,
     DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
     BANGALORE-560 001.
                             -3-
                                         WP No. 42 of 2023




10. DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX
    MEMBER (TAX PAYER SERVICES),
    NO. 9002, AAYKAR BHAWAN,
    VAISHALI, GAZIABAD,
    UTTAR PRADESH - 201019.

11. PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX
    (LEGAL AND RESEARCH),
    NO. 9002, AAYKAR BHAWAN,
    VAISHALI, GAZIABAD,
    UTTAR PRADESH - 201019.

12. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (VIGILANCE)/CVO
    NO. 9002, AAYKAR BHAWAN,
    VAISHALI, GAZIABAD
    UTTAR PRADESH - 201019.

13. OFFICE OF THE GST COUNCIL SECRETARIAT
    5TH FLOOR, TOWER II,
    JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING,
    JANPATH ROAD,
    CONNAUGHT PLACE,
    NEW DELHI-110 001.
                                       ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H., DSG FOR R1 TO R4
    SRI. S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R5, R6, R7 AND R9)


     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECT   /   ISSUE   PERMANENT    INJUNCTION   TO   ALL   THE
CONCERNED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO COME OUT WITH
MORE FEASIBLE SOLUTION AND ETC.


     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                              -4-
                                          WP No. 42 of 2023




                          ORDER

After hearing the party-in-person and on perusal of the documents placed on record, it reveals that certain basic documents are missing. The party-in-person seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition (PIL) with liberty to file a proper and comprehensive writ petition.

2. Submission is accepted. Leave granted.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn, with the above said liberty.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE RD