Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad

Sonu vs Union Of India Through Chief Postmaster ... on 4 October, 2013

      

  

  

 (OPEN COURT)

CENTRAL   ADMINISTRATIVE   TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH
ALLAHABAD



ALLAHABAD this the 04th    day of October, 2013.

Original  Application  Number.  1269   OF 2013.


HONBLE MR. SHASHI PRAKASH, MEMBER (A)

Sonu, Son of late Ram Saran (Postman), Resident of Mohalla  Ziakher, Post Office  Pradhan, Shahjahanpur, District - Shahjahanpur. 
Applicant.	            
VE R S U S

1. 	Union of India through Chief Postmaster General, U.P. Zone, Lucknow - 226001.    
2.	Assistant Director (REC), O/o Chief Post Master General, U.P. Circle, Lucknow (U.P).
3.	The Superintendent of Post Office, Zonal Office, District - Shajahanpur.
4.	The Inspector Post Offices (South), Shahjahanpur - 242001.
				..Respondents

Advocate for the applicant:		Shri Ravi Shankar Tiwari
Advocate for the  Respondents :	Shri 

O R D E R

Heard counsel for the applicants and perused the O.A.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant, whose father died on 12.12.2005 while in service, submitted an application for appointment under dying in harness rules on 29.12.2008. By letter dated 20.01.2012 the applicant was informed that his case is still pending for consideration by the Circle Relaxation Committee in its next meeting. Learned counsel for the applicants fairly submitted that the applicant would be satisfied if a direction is given to the Respondents to consider his case in the next CRC positively.

3. In view of the above the order, which I propose to pass, there is no need to call reply from the respondents.

4. In view of the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant the Respondents are directed to consider the case of the applicant in the next meeting of CRC, as and when takes place, in accordance with rules.

5. Needless to say that I have not passed the order on the merits of the case.

6. With the above observation O.A is disposed off at the admission stage itself. No costs. MEMBER- A. Anand.

??

??

??

??

2