Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Shailesh Kumar vs Union Of India on 14 September, 2015

Author: M.Jaichandren

Bench: M.Jaichandren

        

 
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated:  14.9.2015

Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.Jaichandren

Writ Petition No.22669 of 2012

Shailesh Kumar							..	Petitioner 

		vs.

1.Union of India,
   thro' Secretary,
   Department of Home Affairs,
   New Delhi.

2.Sameer Sidhiqui
3.Kunwar Singh Gupta

4.The Police person or other person
   who is taping call and taking detail
   of the mobile no. and bank account 
   no. annexed in the petition 

5.Jaiprakash Upadhyay						..     Respondents

 Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, for stopping petitioner problem - Get rid of from being back person of petitioner  defaming in police  army and public any where in India  creating problem for living and for doing any profession any where in India  provoking  destroying caller by taping call and taking call detail of petitioner Mobile No.  taking bank account detail  time to time detention by police  For providing to petitioner full support of administration for informing to above mentioned police  army and some place people that petitioner is right person  for taking appropriate action against respondent and his agents for his unlawful activities continuously from February 2011 to till now presented in this petition and pass an order directing the respondents for payment of compensation to victim for extra judicial solution and for destroying petitioner's life more  than 1 =  years on account of the unlawful activities of the respondents.


		For petitioner 	:	No appearance  
		For respondents 	:	Mr.M.Devendran, SCGSC for R1
----- 
O R D E R

When the above Writ Petition had been listed for hearing, on 11.9.2015, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today, i.e. on 14.9.2015, under the caption, 'for dismissal'.

2. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

gs.								14th September, 2015				     
Index:Yes/No.
Internet:Yes/No.

To

1.Union of India,
   thro' Secretary,
   Department of Home Affairs,
   New Delhi.

M.Jaichandren, J.
gs.








WP 22669 of 2012







14.9.2015