Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Jitender Kumar vs East Central Railway (Hajipur) on 27 June, 2017

CENTRAL INFORMATiON COMMISSION
Club building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi" 110067.
Tel: 011 - 26182593/26182594
Email: [email protected]
File No : CIC/AB/A/2016/000771--AB

In the matter of:

Jitender Kumar
East Central Railway,

afieagmafidm/W

Mugalsarai Uttar Pradesh

...Appellant
VS

Central Public Information Officer
P10 / Sr. DPO
East Central Railway, DRM'S Office,
European Colony, Mughal Sarai, Uttar
Pradesh - 232101

...Respondent

Dates

RTl application : 11.12.2015
CPIO reply : 11.02.2016
First Appeal : 27.01.2016
FAA Order : Not on record
Second Appeal : 20.04.2016
Date of hearing : 21.06.2017

Facts:

The appellant sought information on 4 points relating to the LDCE quota reserved for physically challenged employees in accordance with Railway Rules. The CPIO replied on 11.02.2016. The appellant being aggrieved with the reply filed first appeal on 27.01.2016. The FAA'S order is not on record. The appellant filed second appea1 before this Commission on 20.04.2016.

Grounds for Second Appeal The CPIO did not provide the desired information. 1 Order Appeliant : Absent Respondent : P10, Shri Devesh Kumar, COS During the hearing the respondent PIO submitted that they had provided the requisite information vide their letter dated 11.02.2016 which is just and proper and the case should be dismissed.

The appellant was not present to plead his case. On perusal of the case record, it was seen that though proper information was provided, copy of the relevant railway manual/circular/guidelines was not provided to the appellant. A more comprehensive repiy should have been provided to the appellant. The respondent CPIO is directed to provide revised point wise reply complete in ail respects to the appellant as available on record eg. copy of railway 1nannallcircular/guideiines free of charge u/s 7(6) of the RTI Act Within 15 days of the receipt of the order.

The respondent CPIO is further directed to send a repelt containing the copy of the revised reply and the date of despatch of the same to the RTI appellant within 07 days thereafter to the Commission for record.

With the above directiou, the appeal is disposed of. Copies of the order be sent to both the parties free of cost. [Amitava Bhattacharyya] Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (AK. Talapatra) Deputy Registrar