Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Satyanarayan Sharma Son Of Late Shri ... vs Smt. Ladhi Devi Wife Of Late Shri Jagdish ... on 4 September, 2019

                                           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                       BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23882/2018

                                   1.       Satyanarayan Sharma Son Of Late Shri Jagdish Prasad
                                            Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, By Caste Brahmin,
                                            Resident Of Plot No. 27, Kalyan Nagar-Iii, Tonk Road,
                                            Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
                                   2.       Ashok Kumar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Jagdish Prasad
                                            Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, By Caste Brahmin,
                                            Resident Of Plot No. 27, Kalyan Nagar-Iii, Tonk Road,
                                            Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
                                                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                                                        Versus
                                   Smt. Ladhi Devi Wife Of Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, By
                                   Caste Brahmin, Resident Of Plot No. 27, Kalyan Nagar-Iii, Tonk
                                   Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
                                                                                                     ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhas Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Sharma For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order 04/09/2019 The writ petition is dismissed as the petitioner has not cured the defects, pointed out by the registry, since 11.10.2018.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J SUNIL SOLANKI /19/1 (Downloaded on 06/06/2021 at 07:21:52 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)