Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Jabbar Saheblal Shaikh vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 December, 2021

Author: V. G. Bisht

Bench: V. G. Bisht

                                                                          ABA-2988-2021.doc




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2988 OF 2021

                      A. JABBAR SAHEBLAL SHAIKH                     )...APPLICANT

                               V/s.

                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                      )...RESPONDENT


                      Mr.Viresh V. Purwant, Advocate for the Applicant.
                      Smt.Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State.


                                                      CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.

                                                RESERVED ON : 21st DECEMBER 2021
                                             PRONOUNCED ON : 22nd DECEMBER 2021


                      P.C. :


                      1               The present application has been moved by the

                      applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

                      apprehending arrest under Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471,

                      477A, 499, 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) registered vide

                      Crime No.419 of 2021 with Police Station Sadar Bazar, District

                      Solapur.

                      AVK                                                           1/7

ARTI
VILAS
KHATATE
Digitally signed by
ARTI VILAS
KHATATE
Date: 2021.12.22
14:50:46 +0530
                                                      ABA-2988-2021.doc




2          According to learned counsel the applicant was

appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 21st July 1988             and

thereafter since 10th May 1991, he is working as Head Master in

Shri Parmeshwar Ashram Shala, Kamati (K), Laman Tanda. The

said school is run by Shri. Shiv Chaitanya Parmartik Seva Sangh,

Parmeshwar Mandir, Taluka Mohol, District Solapur, a Trust

registered under Bombay Public Trust Act.



3          The learned counsel next submits that after repeated

failure of the informant before all authorities, he approached the

Director, VJNT, OBC, SBC, Welfare Directorate, Government of

Maharashtra, Pune. The learned Director was pleased to issue

notice to all concerned. The applicant submitted his reply. The

Assistant Commissioner, Social Welfare, Solapur, also submitted

his report-cum-say to each and every issue raised in the said

complaint. Though informant was also issued notice to appear

along with all documents on 8th April 2019, he remained absent.




AVK                                                            2/7
                                                      ABA-2988-2021.doc




4          According to the learned counsel in the present First

Information Report (FIR) the informant alleges that the applicant

by making forged documents and affidavits etc. purported to be

genuine documents received benefits and grants from the

Department of Social Justice and Social Welfare of the State of

Maharashtra every year from 2000. It is further alleged that he

misappropriated the said amount of Rs.1 crore and also cheated

the said Organization by receiving excessive illegal salaries from

2nd March 1998 till date.



5          According to learned counsel, before filing of the

present FIR an earlier FIR bearing No.104 of 2012 dated 24th

April 2012 was registered with Sadar Bazar Police Station by one

Nagnath Nimbalkar, at the instance of informant. The said FIR

was lodged against the applicant and four others who were

Assistant Teachers. However, after thorough investigation and

recording statements of witnesses, the then Investigating Officer

was pleased to submit "C" Summary Report before the learned

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Solapur.   The learned Judicial

AVK                                                            3/7
                                                        ABA-2988-2021.doc




Magistrate First Class after hearing both sides was pleased to

grant "C" Summary Report in FIR No.104 of 2012.



6           According to learned counsel now the FIR on the

same grounds has been filed. There are vague allegations. Even

otherwise, having regard to the nature of accusation, there is no

necessity of custodial interrogation as the alleged offence is

based on documentary evidence. The applicant, being Principal,

therefore deserves to be given the benefit of pre-arrest bail.



7           Smt.Veera Shinde, learned APP, on the other hand,

opposed the statement by contending that the applicant not only

prepared fake teachers list but the division of classes in the

school were fabricated just in order to secure the grant from the

Government.     There was misappropriation of public money.

Having regard to the nature of accusation, custody of the

applicant is necessary, argued learned APP.




AVK                                                              4/7
                                                       ABA-2988-2021.doc




8          Perused the investigation papers.        I have gone

through the earlier FIR No.104 of 2012 dated 24 th April 2012

which was under Section 468, 471, 420, 34 of the IPC against the

present applicant and four others.      Similar accusations were

made in the said FIR. It further appears that the said FIR was

thoroughly investigated and thereafter "C" Summary Report

came to be submitted before the learned Judicial Magistrate First

Class, Solapur. The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class after

hearing the concerned parties was pleased to issue "C" Summary

Report. It is also clear from the record that the said order of the

Magistrate was not challenged.



9          Now, again, more or less similar allegations are

forming part of the FIR in question. Although the learned APP

has filed compilation before me today, but the allegations made

in the compilation date back to 5th June 2008 (Exh. A). Then

there is order of Secretary, Social Justice Department holding

that since Shri Shiv Chaitanya Paramartik Seva Sangh, Kamati,

had fabricated the division of classes by issuing forged

AVK                                                             5/7
                                                       ABA-2988-2021.doc




appointment letters of teachers, he committed criminal breach of

Trust in respect of government monies and therefore the

recognition was cancelled. It may not be out of place to mention

that   findings were given        by the Secretary, Social Justice

Department on 26th March 2013. Similarly, there is order of

Minister, Social Justice Department, dated 21 st August 2009

giving the same findings. However, one cannot be oblivious of

the fact that detail inquiry was carried out by Sadar Bazar Police

Station vis-a-vis FIR No.104 of 2012 wherein allegations were

more or less the same and "C" Summary came to be granted by

the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class.



10          Assuming for the sake of argument that some

irregularities have been done by said Sanstha, the same being of

documentary nature, custodial interrogation of the Principal is

not necessary. The applicant can be well directed to co-operate

the Investigating Officer. Hence, I pass the following order :

                              ORDER

(i) The application is allowed.

AVK 6/7

ABA-2988-2021.doc

(ii) In the event of his arrest in Crime No.419 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 499, 500 of the IPC registered with Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Solapur, applicant A. Jabbar Saheblal Shaikh be released on bail on executing P.R.Bond in sum of Rs.20,000/- with 1/2 surety in like amount.

(iii) The applicant shall attend Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Solapur, as and when called by the Investigating Officer.

(iv) The applicant shall not tamper the prosecution evidence.

(v) The application stands disposed off accordingly.

(V. G. BISHT, J.) AVK 7/7