Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Jhasaketan Bag vs State Of Odisha ........ Opp. Party on 2 July, 2020

Author: S.K. Panigrahi

Bench: S.K. Panigrahi

                                          HIGH COURT OF ORISSA


                                                 BLAPL No.4158 of 2020


                             Jhasaketan Bag                                 ........ Petitioner
                                                          Versus
                            State of Odisha                                 ........ Opp. Party


02.   02.07.2020              In view of extraordinary situation arose out of COVID-19, the
                   matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.
                              Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
                   for the State.
                            The petitioner is an accused in connection with C.T. Case No.72
                   of 2019 in the file of learned District & Sessions Judge, Bargarh initially
                   registered under Sections 498-A/323/304-B/34, I.P.C. read with Section 4
                   of the D.P. Act. After completion of investigation, charge-sheeted under
                   Sections 498-A/323/304-B/306/34, I.P.C. read with Section 4 of the D.P.
                   Act.
                            It is alleged that on 24.03.2019 an F.I.R. lodged by the
                   complainant alleging therein that his deceased sister married to the
                   accused as per Hindu Caste and Customs about nine years back from the
                   date of lodging of F.I.R. She blessed with two children. It is further alleged
                   that on the date of the reporting at about 4.30 P.M. in the afternoon, he
                   received information about the death of the victim whereafter, he and
                   other relations went to the village of the in-laws of the deceased and
                   found the latter lying dead on a cot. He further alleged that the accused
                   husband and other in-laws named in the F.I.R. have allegedly killed her
                                       2




     as she was being regularly subjected to physical and mental torture. On
     the lodging of the report at Bheden P.S., the accused petitioner was
     arrested and produced before the court below on 02.04.2019.
             Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she committed
     suicide by consuming poison. The petitioner has been falsely implicated
     in the case.
             Perused the F.I.R. and other materials available on record.
             Considering the submissions made and the nature and gravity of
     the offence, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner.
     Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.
             The Bail Application is accordingly disposed of.
             As Lock-down period is continuing for COVID-19, learned
     counsel for the petitioner may utilize the soft copy of this order available
     in the High Court's website or print out thereof at par with certified
     copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated
     25.03.2020.
                                                     ...........................
                                                      S.K. Panigrahi, J.

JB