Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

(Wbsidc) vs Kaushalya Infrastructure Development ... on 6 December, 2021

Author: Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur

OD-8

                              IA NO. GA/1/2021
                               In AP/128/2019
                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                ORIGINAL SIDE


 THE WEST BENGAL SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
                            (WBSIDC)
                               Vs
 KAUSHALYA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.(KIDCO)


  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
  Date : 6th December, 2021.


                                                                            Appearance:
                                                          Mr. Hirak Kumar Mitra, Sr. Adv.
                                                      Mr. Kamal Kr. Chattapadhyay, Adv.
                                                                          Mr. T. Ali, Adv.
                                                                      Ms. S. Ghosh, Adv.

                                                      Mr. Rudraman Bhattacharyya, Adv.
                                                                Mr. Arkaprava Sen, Adv.
                                                                Mr. S. Chakraborty, Adv.


       The Court: This is an application under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in terms of

the award dated October 6, 2018, the petitioner has been directed to pay the

principal amount of approximately Rs. 34 lakhs to the respondent.

In view of the submission made on behalf of the parties, I grant a stay of operation of the award dated October 6, 2018 upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for an amount of Rs. 34 lakhs to the satisfaction of the Registrar, High Court, Calcutta. The petitioner is also directed to ensure that the bank 2 guarantee is kept alive till the disposal of the application under Section 34 of the Act.

With the aforesaid directions, GA 1 of 2021 stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Let AP 128 of 2019 appear on December 20, 2021.

(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) SK