Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The Committee For The vs The Karnataka State Board Of Auqaf on 15 March, 2024

                                             -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:5314
                                                      WP No. 104839 of 2016




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                      DHARWAD BENCH
                          DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
                                           BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
                        WRIT PETITION NO. 104839 OF 2016 (GM-WAKF)

                   BETWEEN:
                        THE COMMITTEE FOR THE
                        MANAGEMENT OF JAMIA MASJID(SUNNI),
                        WARD NO.3, MUDHOL,
                        TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT,
                        REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
                        RIYAJAHMAD S/O AMANULLA SARAWAN,
                        AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                        R/O: MUDHOL, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
                                                              ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. S B HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
                   1.   THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF
VISHAL
NINGAPPA                NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD,
PATTIHAL
Location: HIGH
                        BENGALURU-52,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
Date: 2024.03.15
                        R/BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
16:52:46 +0530




                   2.   WAKF OFFICER,
                        DISTRICT WAKF ADVISORY COMMITTEE,
                        BAGALKOT DISTRICT BAGALKOT.

                   3.   DILAVARSAB A DHARWADKAR
                        AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
                        R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
                        TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
                           -2-
                                   NC: 2024:KHC-D:5314
                                 WP No. 104839 of 2016




4.   MUBARAK M CHISTI
     AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
     R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
     TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

5.   MAMADGAUS M ATHANI
     AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
     R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
     TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

6.   HUSENSAB S SARWAN
     AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
     R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
     TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

7.   DASTGIR H MOMIN
     AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
     R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
     TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

8.   MADARSAB U BISTI
     AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
     R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
     TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.


9.   MAULAALI G SARWAN
     AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
     R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
     TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.


10. FAZALALI M MOMIN
    AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
    R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
    TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
                          -3-
                                   NC: 2024:KHC-D:5314
                                 WP No. 104839 of 2016




11. BABULAL HUSEN M MANIYAR
    AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
    R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
    TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

12. ARIF M MOMIN
    AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
    R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
    TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

13. USMANBAIG R JAMADAR
    AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
    R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
    TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

14. MAMAD HUSEN S KUDACHI
    AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
    R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
    TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.

15. SHABBIR M CHISTI
    AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN,
    R/O: MAIN ROAD, MUDHOL,
    TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
                                       ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.B. SHAIKH, ADVOCATE FOR R1,
SRI. H.M. DHARIGOND, ADVOCATE FOR R3-R15,
NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:02.05.2016, PASSED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.KBW/CMC/BLS/100/BGT/2013-14, A
COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED HEREIN AS PER ANNEXURE-B.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN GROUP 'B', THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                             -4-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:5314
                                    WP No. 104839 of 2016




                          ORDER

The Advocate for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Memo is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE NAA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18