Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Jagdish Chand vs State Of Hp And Others on 19 February, 2015

Author: Rajiv Sharma

Bench: Rajiv Sharma

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
                                              CWP No. 1276/2013
                                            Decided on 19.2.2015
    _______________________________________________________________




                                                                                .
    Jagdish Chand                                ...........Petitioner





                                                    Versus
    State of HP and others                     ..........Respondents





    _______________________________________________________________
    Coram:
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?                   1





    For the Petitioner                     :      Mr.   Lalit            Kumar          Sehgal,
                                                  Advocate.

    For the Respondents           Mr.      :
                                         M.A.   Khan,    Additional
                                  Advocate General with Mr. N.K.
                        r         Sharma,      Deputy     Advocate

                                  General.
    _______________________________________________________________
    Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present lis is squarely covered by judgment rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 2903/2009 titled Mohinder Singh vs. State of H.P. and others(Annexure P-10), LPA No. 107/2009 titled State of H.P. & others vs. Mohinder Singh(Annexure P-12) and CWP(T) No. 5798/2008 titled as Subhash Chand & another vs. State of H.P. and others(Annexure P-13).

2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:36:27 :::HCHP 2

petitioners in view of the principles laid down in the aforementioned judgments, within a period of six weeks from .

today.

Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.






                                                         (Rajiv Sharma)
                                                        Vacation Judge
       19.2.2015
        (vikrant)




                   r                 to









                                               ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:36:27 :::HCHP