Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Bro.Philip Pinto & Ors vs Nilkanth Shrikhande & Ors on 30 August, 2018

Author: G.S. Patel

Bench: G.S. Patel

                                                                  915-S1865-80.DOC




 Arun



    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                               SUIT NO. 1865 OF 1980


 Bro Philip Pinto & Ors                                                ...Plaintiffs
       Versus
 Nilkanth Shrikhande & Ors                                         ...Defendants

                                       WITH
                 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 931 OF 2014
                                         IN
                               SUIT NO. 1865 OF 1980
                                       WITH
                 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 134 OF 2017
                                         IN
                               SUIT NO. 1865 OF 1980
                                       WITH
                 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 931 OF 2014
                                         IN
                               SUIT NO. 1865 OF 1980
                                       WITH
                CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 86 OF 2016
                                         IN
                 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 5 OF 2004
                                       WITH
                 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 6 OF 2017



                                      Page 1 of 3
                                   30th August 2018

::: Uploaded on - 31/08/2018                          ::: Downloaded on - 01/09/2018 02:22:44 :::
                                                                   915-S1865-80.DOC




                                         IN
                 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 5 OF 2004
                                       WITH
                 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 134 OF 2017
                                         IN
                               SUIT NO. 1865 OF 1980


 Mr Karl Tamboly, with Mrs Nandini Joshi, i/b Harish Joshi &
      Company, for the Plaintiff in Testamentary Suit No. 5 of 2004
      and Defendants Nos. 1A & 2 in Suit No. 1865 of 1980.
 Mr Kunal Dwarkadas, with Vidya Chaudhari, i/b Chambers of Javed
      Gaya, for the Plaintiffs in Suit No. 1865 of 1980 and for the
      Defendants in Testamentary Suit No. 5 of 2004.
 Mr Sanjay Bhatia, for the Applicant in Chamber Summons No. 86 of
      2016.
 Mr Nimay Dave, with Ms Dipti Das & Mr Anagh Pradhan, i/b Divya
      Shah Associates, for Defendants Nos. 5a to 5c & 6, in Suit No.
      1865 of 1980.


                               CORAM:       G.S. PATEL, J
                               DATED:       30th August 2018
 PC:-


 1.

Mr Dave states, on the basis of telephonic instructions previously received, that every member of the branch of Marie Correa, a daughter of the deceased Cosmos Damain T Pinto, waives personal service of the citations. Marie Correa died in 2013. Her husband too has passed on. They are survived by their four children, two daughters and two sons, in order: Romar Correa, Nicolette D'Souza, Johann Correa and Mariette Correa. Mr Dave has further Page 2 of 3 30th August 2018 ::: Uploaded on - 31/08/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 01/09/2018 02:22:44 ::: 915-S1865-80.DOC instructions to state that Romar has a Power of Attorney from his siblings and that the Correa children proposed to enter a Caveat and contest the application for Letters of Administration with some sort of alleged testamentary writing annexed. (I may be forgiven for using this somewhat unusual terminology but that is precisely the controversy in the present case.) Service of citations on Romar, Nicolette, Johann and Mariette is dispensed with. They are permitted to file their caveats and Affidavits in Support. The Caveat(s) from the four Correas with accompanying Affidavit/s in Support is/are to be filed and served on or before 25th September 2018.

2. Having regard to the past history of the matter and the fact that at some point, evidence was previously taken, I believe a number of additional directions will now be required.

3. List the matter on 4th October 2018 for directions.

(G. S. PATEL, J) Page 3 of 3 30th August 2018 ::: Uploaded on - 31/08/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 01/09/2018 02:22:44 :::