Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

M/S Tecpro System Limited vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 March, 2019

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                 BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7048/2018

M/s Tecpro System Limited
                                                  ----Petitioner
                             Versus
State Of Rajasthan
                                                ----Respondent

Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7054/2018 Amul Gabrani, Managing Director And Vice Chairman

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7055/2018 M/s Tecpro System Limited

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7056/2018 M/s Tecpro System Limited

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7057/2018 Techpro System Limited

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7058/2018 M/s Tecpro System Limted

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7059/2018 M/s Tecpro System Limited (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7048/2018]

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8077/2018 Rishiraj Singh S/o Thakur Shri Raghuveer Singh B/c Rajput

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan Through Pp

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8078/2018 Ravinder Muwal S/o Shri Shishpal Singh Muwal B/c Jat

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Chawala PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

-/Order/-

13/03/2019 In the present case, on 28.2.2019, counsel for the petitioner had sought adjournment to distinguish the judgment rendered by Supreme Court in the case of Metres and Instruments Private Limited & Ors. vs. Kanchan Mehta, (2018) 1 SCC 560.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is not ready to argue the matter.

Adjourned sine die. List as and when counsel for the petitioner files an application that he is ready and willing to argue the matter.

(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J Mak/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)