Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Naresh Kumar Sharma Son Of vs Shri Kamlesh Kumar Pant Son Of on 31 August, 2022

Author: Satyen Vaidya

Bench: Satyen Vaidya

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                     ON THE 31st DAY OF APRIL, 2022
                                  BEFORE
                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
            CONTEMPT PETITION (TRIBUNAL) No. 1169 of 2020




                                                            .
    Between:-





    NARESH KUMAR SHARMA SON OF
    SH. AMAR NATH SHARMA, RESIDENT
    OF VILLAGE DHALIANI, POST OFFICE BHAPRAL,
    TEHSIL GHUMARWIN, DISTRICT BILASPUR,





    H.P., PREENTLY WORKING AS LECTURER
    IN ENGLISH (SCHOOL CADRE) AT GSSS KHANOT,
     TEHSIL SARKAGHAT, DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.





                                                              ....PETITIONER

    (SH. RAJESH KUMAR & RAJENDER KUMAR, ADVOCATES)

                          AND


    1.   SHRI KAMLESH KUMAR PANT SON OF
         NOT KNOWN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
         (EDUCATION), TO THE GOVERNMENT
         OF HIMAHCAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-2.


    2.   DR. AMARJEET K. SHARMA SON OF
         NOT KNOWN, DIRECTOR OF HIGHER
         EDUCTION, HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA.




                                                            ....RESPONDENTS





    (MR. DESH RAJ THAKUR, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH
    MR. NARENDER THAKUR, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL AND MR.
    MANOJ BAGGA, ASSISTANT ADVOCATE GENERAL,)





                This petition coming on for admission this day, the
    Court passed the following:
                                  ORDER

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 30.07.2021, whereby it is informed that the entire arrears amounting to Rs.76,199/- (Seventy Six Thousand ::: Downloaded on - 31/08/2022 20:09:11 :::CIS -2- One Hundred Ninety Nine) stands paid to the petitioner on 28th July, 2021.

.

In view of the above, nothing survives in the petition and the same is accordingly disposed of.


                                                              (Satyen Vaidya)





                                                                  Judge
    31st August,2022
         (tarun)




                      r           to









                                              ::: Downloaded on - 31/08/2022 20:09:11 :::CIS