Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

Emtici Engineering Ltd vs Asstt.Commissioner Of Gift ... on 4 December, 2014

Author: Ks Jhaveri

Bench: Ks Jhaveri, K.J.Thaker

        O/TAXAP/372/2002                              ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       TAX APPEAL NO. 372 of 2002

================================================================
              EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD.....Appellant(s)
                            Versus
          ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX....Opponent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR RK PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
               and
               HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER

                            Date : 04/12/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI)

1. The   I.A.C.   has   observed   in   paragraph  No.3(vii) as under:­ vii. The objection to the proposed adoption   of fair  market value of 9220  equity shares   of   power   Build   (Pvt)   Ltd   of   Rs.359.11   per   share as against Rs.100/­ per share sold is   two fold firstly that the fair market value   estimated   at   Rs.84   per   share   as   per   the  valuation   report   of   the   registered   valuer   was in order and secondly the provisions of   Section 52 can not be invoked. S/Sri Talati   and   Desai   vehemently   contended   that   the   valuation report of the departmental valuer   suffered   from   gross   mistake   in   that   departmental   valuer   adopted   average   of  profits of  power Build  (Pvt.) Ltd.  for two   years   only   whereas   profits   of   atleast   3   Page 1 of 3 O/TAXAP/372/2002 ORDER years   should   have   been   adopted   and   further   that   the   departmental   valuer   grossly   erred   in   not   reducing   tax   liability   from   the  adjusted profits. It was submitted that the   reasons given by the departmental valuer for   not   taking   average   of   3   years   were   not   at   all sound. In fact for the purpose of taking   average a minimum period of 3 years (if not  5   years),   is   essential   so   that   the   abnormalities   would   be   smoothened.   I   find   considerable   force   in   this   submission.  According   to   me,   therefore,   the   period   for   working   out   the   average   profit   would   be   3   years ending on 31.3.75, 31.3.76 and 31.3.77   as done by the registered valuer. So far as  issue   of   deducting   tax   liability   from   the   average   adjusted   profit   is   concerned   Shri   Talai   refereed   to   Board's   circular   No.2­ d(WT)   of   1964   dated   15.5.1964   wherein   in  para 2(a) the Board has emphasized that the   liability for  tax is definitely one of the   facts   which   weighs   in   the   mind   of   a   prospective buyer of shares and thus affects   the   market   value   of   shares.   Shri   Talati   further   referred   to   Board's   Circular  F.No.4/28/68   W   T   dated   27.1.69   wherein   in   para 2 the Board has mentioned as under:­ "..........maintainable profits of a company   should be calculated as under:­

(iv) The   development   rebate,   in   case   it   is   debited   in   the   books   of   account,   will   be  added back.

(v) The   appropriate   tax   liability   of   the   company   on   the   book   profits   so   determined   will be deducted."

It was  contended  that  the  departmental   valuer   should   have   deducted   the   tax   liability   of   the   company   on   the   books   profits   so   determined   in   the   light   of   Board's above circular, as was done by the   registered valuer in his valuation report. I   am inclined to agree with the contention of   Page 2 of 3 O/TAXAP/372/2002 ORDER Shri Talati. In other words tax liability as   worked   out   by   the   registered  valuer   will  have   to   be   deducted.   After   adopting   the   average profit on the basis of the period of   3   years   and   after   considering   the   tax   liability   the   fair   market   value   as   worked   out by the departmental valuer is considered   as   fair.   In   other   words   it   cannot   be   said   that the sale of 9220 equity shares of power   Build (Pvt) ltd. of Rs.100 per share was low   by   any   manner   of   means.   You   should   therefore,   accept   the   sale   price   of   Rs.100   per share. Since it has been held by me that   the   declared   sale   price   of   Rs.100/­   is   in   order   the   issue   relating   to   the   applicability   of   provisions   u/s   52   becomes   academic and is not discussed. 

2. Mr.   Parikh,   learned   advocate   for   the  respondent requests for time to seek instructions from  the respondent. S.O. to 17th December, 2014.

(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) (K.J.THAKER, J) pawan Page 3 of 3