Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 7]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Anju Sachdeva vs State Of Haryana on 5 October, 2015

Author: Hari Pal Verma

Bench: Hari Pal Verma

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                               AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                         CRM-M-29761 of 2015.
                                                                         Decided on:-05.10.2015.

                     Anju Sachdeva.
                                                                                           .........Petitioner.
                                                              Versus
                     State of Haryana.
                                                                                          .........Respondent.

                     CORAM:           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA.

                               1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?
                               2. To be referred to reporters or not?
                               3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

                     Present:-        Mr. D.K. Tuteja, Advocate
                                      for the petitioner.

                                      Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

                     HARI PAL VERMA, J. (ORAL)

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.598 dated 15.7.2015 under Sections 406, 420, 200, 181 and 171 IPC registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar.

This Court vide order dated 3.9.2015 had granted interim bail to the petitioner to the satisfaction of arresting/investigating officer. However, it was ordered that she shall abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that pursuant to order dated 3.9.2015, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Dara Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and her custodial YAG DUTT 2015.10.05 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29761 of 2015 -2- interrogation is not required at this stage.

In view of the above, the instant petition is allowed and the interim bail granted by this Court to the petitioner vide order dated 3.9.2015 is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.


                                                                    (HARI PAL VERMA)
                     October 05, 2015                                    JUDGE
                     Yag Dutt




YAG DUTT
2015.10.05 18:34
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document