Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Scj Plastic Limited vs Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Service ... on 15 September, 2022

Author: Rajiv Shakdher

Bench: Rajiv Shakdher

             $~8 & 9
             *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

             +           VAT APPEAL 9/2021
                         SCJ PLASTIC LIMITED                      ......Appellant
                                        Through: Mr Rajesh Mahna, Mr Akshay Bhatia
                                        & Mr Mayank Kouts, Advs.

                                           versus

                         COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
                                                                 ......Respondent
                                     Through: Mr Rishikesh Kumar, ASC GNCTD
                                     with Ms Sheenu Priya & Mr Sudhir Shukla, Advs.

             +           VAT APPEAL 10/2021
                         SCJ PLASTIC LIMITED                      ......Appellant
                                        Through: Mr Rajesh Mahna, Mr Akshay Bhatia
                                        & Mr Mayank Kouts, Advs.

                                           versus

                         COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
                                                                   ......Respondent
                                      Through: Mr Rishikesh Kumar, ASC                   with
                                      Ms Sheenu Priya & Mr Sudhir Shukla, Advs.
                         CORAM:
                         HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
                         HON'BLE MS JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
                                           ORDER

% 15.09.2022 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

1. After some arguments, Mr Rajesh Mahna, who appears on behalf of the appellant, seeks leave to withdraw the above-captioned appeals, to take recourse to an appropriate remedy, to demonstrate that movement of goods did take place, pursuant to a contract, in terms of Section 3(1)(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

VAT APPEAL 9/2021 & 10/2021 1/2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAUSHAL KUMAR SACHDEVA Signing Date:03.10.2022 21:57:50

2. Accordingly, the above-captioned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, albeit as per law.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TARA VITASTA GANJU, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2022/r Click here to check corrigendum, if any VAT APPEAL 9/2021 & 10/2021 2/2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAUSHAL KUMAR SACHDEVA Signing Date:03.10.2022 21:57:50