Karnataka High Court
Shashwathi Enterprises vs Commissioner Of Police on 26 September, 2014
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
Bench: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
WRIT PETITION Nos.37499/2014 and 37604/2014
(GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN
1. SHASHWATHI ENTERPRISES
NO1/3, I ST FLOOR, SUJATHA COMPLEX,
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560009
REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER
MOHAN M SHETTY
S/O MABU SHETTY
AGE-ABOUT 47 YEARS.
2. SAMRUDDHI ENTERPRISES
VEENA MANSION, NO 186/10
1ST FLOOR, J.C.COMPLEX,
SIRUR PARK ROAD,
SESHADRIPURAM,
BANGALORE-5600020
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
ASHOK HEGDE
S/O SADANANDA HEGDE
AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS.
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADV.)
AND
1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
LICENSING AUTHORITY
INFANTRY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
-2-
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
INFANTRY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
WEST DIVISION
UPPERPET, BANGALORE-560 001.
4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
CENTRAL DIVISION
CUBBON PARK,
BANGALORE-560 001.
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri.VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL, HCGP)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO:
DIRECT THE R1 TO 2 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATIONS AS PER
ANN-C & C1, DT.17.8.13 OF THE PETITIONERS FOR THE YEAR
2014-15 FOR ISSUANCE OF THE DISCOTHEQUE LINCENSE AND
ETC.,
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRLY. HEARING 'B'
GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -
ORDER
Heard Sri Devi Prasad Shetty, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Sri Vijaykumar A Patil, learned HCGP, for the respondents and perused the writ petition record.
-3-
2. Petitioners made an application, dated 17.8.2013, as at Annexure-C, in the prescribed form for renewal of licence to conduct discotheque, in their premises No.1/3, Sujatha Complex, 1st Main Road, Gandhinagar, Bangalore-09. The application made on 17.8.2013 was for the period 2013-14. The application having not been considered, asking for a mandamus to consider the applications as per Annexures-C and C1, for the year 2014-15 i.e., for issuance of discotheque licence, this writ petition was filed.
3. From perusal of Annexure-C1, it is clear that the licence was sought, on 17.8.2013, for one year period i.e. 2013-14. The period for which the licence was sought as per the said application having expired, mandamus cannot be issued to the respondents to consider Annexure-C and C1 and pass orders. -4-
In the said view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to submit a fresh application, for consideration and decision by the respondents, with expedition and within a period of six weeks from the date the application is accompanied by the relevant enclosures, etc., if any, is submitted.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE AP/-