Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Chetan Jaydev Mehta And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 June, 2022

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                                                                 1 of 2                 27.APL.631.2022.doc




                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.631 OF 2022

                               Chetan Jaydev Mehta and another                           Applicants
                                            versus
                               The State of Maharashtra                                  Respondent

                               Mr.T.J.Pandian with T.C.Subramanian, Advocate for applicants.
                               Mr.A.R.Patil, APP, for State.

                                                         CORAM :      PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                                                         DATE     :   21st June 2022
                               PC :


                               1.      The applicants have preferred this application for cancellation
                               of non-bailable warrant issued against them on 30th April 2022


                               2.      The proceedings are pending before learned 51 st Metropolitan
                               Magistrate, Kurla, Mumbai vide CC No.948/PW/2007 for the
                               offences under Sections 353, 332, 504, 427 r/w 34 of Indian Penal
                               Code.


                               3.      Learned counsel for applicants submitted that the FIR was
                               registered in 2007 and apparently charge sheet was filed thereafter.
                               The applicants had never received any summons or notice with
                               regards to filing of charge sheet and were not aware about pendency
                               of proceedings. Offence u/s.353 is now triable by Court of Sessions.
                               The Trial Court is likely to commit the case to the Court of Sessions.
         Digitally signed by
MANISH   MANISH SURESH
SURESH   THATTE
         Date: 2022.06.23
THATTE   10:53:25 +0530


                               4.      Learned APP submit that case is pending in Court since 2007.
                               The applicants ought to have been diligent about the proceedings
                                    2 of 2                  27.APL.631.2022.doc


initiated against them since FIR was registered against them and
they were aware about registration of FIR. However, considering the
circumstance that notice of filing of charge sheet was not received by
the applicants, the warrant issued against applicants can be set aside
with directions to applicants to regularly appear before the Court of
Magistrate and after committal of the case before appropriate Trial
Court.


5.      In view of the aforesaid factual aspects, I pass following order:


                                 ORDER

(i) Non-bailable warrant issued vide order dated 30 th April 2022 is quashed and set aside;

(ii) The applicants shall regularly appear before the Court of Magistrate and thereafter before the Court of Sessions, unless exempted by the said Courts;

(iii) Criminal Application stands disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST