Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Arunkumar Mahabirprasad Jatia vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 1 April, 2024

Author: Neela Gokhale

Bench: K. R. Shriram, Neela Gokhale

         Digitally
2024:BHC-OS:5607-DB
        signed by
         MEERA
MEERA    MAHESH                                              1/2                    411-wpl-13130-23.doc
MAHESH   JADHAV
JADHAV   Date:
         2024.04.03
         18:40:12
         +0530                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                          WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 13130 OF 2023

               Arunkumar Mahabirprasad Jatia                                   ....Petitioner
                     V/s.
               The Assistant Commissioner of Income
               Tax Central Circle 7(1) Mumbai & Ors.                           ....Respondents

                                                ----
               Mr. Madhur Agarwal a/w Mr. Rohan Deshpande i/b Ms Alisha Pinto for
               Petitioner.
               Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents
                                                ----
                                            CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &
                                                     Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATED : 1st APRIL 2024 P.C. :

1 Mr. Agarwal states that the facts and issues in this petition will be covered by the judgment of this court in Karan Maheshwari Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 8(4) & Ors. 1 Mr. Suresh Kumar agrees.
2 Therefore, petition allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under:
"(a) issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, quashing the impugned order u/s 147A(d) dated 24th April 2023(Exhibit O) the impugned notice u/s 148 dated 24th April 2023 (Exhibit P) and the impugned reassessment proceedings for AY-2016-17 as being wholly without jurisdiction, illegal and arbitrary."

3 Mr. Suresh Kumar states that after the petition was filed, a reassessment order dated 31st March 2024 has been passed based on the 1 2024 Scc Online Bom 853 Meera Jadhav ::: Uploaded on - 03/04/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 03/04/2024 23:43:47 ::: 2/2 411-wpl-13130-23.doc order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) dated 24th April 2023. Since we have quashed and set aside the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 24 th March 2023, the reassessment order based on a notice issued under Section 148 relying on the quashed order also cannot survive. Therefore, reassessment order dated 31 st March 2024 is also quashed and set aside.

4 Petition disposed.

(Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Meera Jadhav ::: Uploaded on - 03/04/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 03/04/2024 23:43:47 :::