Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Noufal V.K vs State Of Kerala Through The on 25 February, 2008

Author: R. Basant

Bench: R.Basant

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1145 of 2008()


1. NOUFAL V.K.,,S/O.KHALID, AGED 28 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :25/02/2008

 O R D E R
                              R. BASANT, J.

                     - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                       B.A.No.  1145  of   2008

                     - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

              Dated this the 25th day of  February, 2008


                                  O R D E R

Application for regular bail. The petitioner is the 4th accused. Altogether there are 15 accused persons. The accused face allegations for offences punishable, inter alia, under Section 308 I.P.C. The injured belong to C.P.M. and the accused persons allegedly owed allegiance to NDF. The alleged incident took place on 10.1.2008. The petitioner was arrested on 19.1.2008. On account of political animosity, an attack was made on the victims belonging to the CPM using iron rods. No serious/ grievous injury has been suffered. Had the weapon landed on more vulnerable part of the body, death would have taken place. This is the allegations raised. The petitioner continues in custody from 19.1.2008. One of the co-accused (A6) has been arrested and he has already been enlarged on bail. It is prayed that the petitioner, who remains in custody from 19.1.2008, may now be enlarged on bail subject to appropriate terms and conditions. B.A.No. 1145 of 2008 2

2. Notice was given. The learned Prosecutor does not oppose the application. He only prays that appropriate conditions may be imposed, considering the nature of the dispute, to ensure that there is no possibility of recurrence of the incident.

3. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I am satisfied that the petitioner can be granted regular bail.

4. In the result:

1) This application is allowed.
2) The petitioner shall be released on bail on the following terms and conditions.
(a) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to be satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.
(b) He shall surrender the passport, if any. If there is no passport, an affidavit to that effect shall be filed before the learned Magistrate.
(c) He shall make himself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 10 a.m. B.A.No. 1145 of 2008 3 and 12 noon for a period of three months and thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer in writing to do so.
(b) During the said period of three months the petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Valapatanam Police Station without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate, except for the purpose of complying with condition (c) above.

(R. BASANT) Judge tm