Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Suvendu Adhikari vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 27 June, 2022

Author: Shampa Sarkar

Bench: Shampa Sarkar

     27.06.2022
     Sl. No.59
     ss                                      W.P.A. 10533 of 2022

                                            Suvendu Adhikari
          ,,




                                                   Vs.
                                     The State of West Bengal & ors.

                              Mr.   Soumya Majumder
                              Mr.   Srijib Chakraborty
                              Mr.   Anish Kumar Mukherjee
                              Mr.   Aditya Mondal
                              Mr.   Amrit Sinha        ... for the petitioner

                              Mr.   Anirban Roy, Ld. G.P.
                              Mr.   Amal Kr. Sen
                              Mr.   Nilotpal Chatterjee
                              Mr.   Subhabrata Das
                              Mr.   Lal Mohan Basu      ... for the State

                              Mr. Lokenath Chatterje
                              Mr. Sukanta Ghosh ... for the Union of India


                              The allegation is with regard to overt act of
                  ,,
<,




                       the police authorities, in wrongfully stopping the

                       petitioner at Purba Medinipur, when the unrest was

                       prevailing in Howrah.

                              The matter has to be decided on affidavit.

                              Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed within a

                       period of four weeks from date; reply thereto, if any,

                       two weeks thereafter.

                              In    the   affidavit-in-opposition   the   State-

                       respondent shall deal with each and every allegation

levelled by the petitioner with regard to the alleged wrongful restraint.

The question of maintainability is kept open. Liberty to mention.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)