Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Value Consulting vs Http:/ /Www.Consumercomplints.In And ... on 14 March, 2019

Author: Anuja Prabhudessai

Bench: Anuja Prabhudessai

    P.H. Jayani                                      04 CHS1357.18.doc


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                    CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1357 OF 2018
                                  WITH
                     NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 659 OF 2016
                                     IN
                     NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 722 OF 2016
                                  WITH
                     NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 722 OF 2016
                                     IN
                           SUIT NO. 560 OF 2013

Value Consulting                                              ....Plaintiff
          V/s.
HTTP://www.consumercomplints.in & ors.                        ....Defendants

Mr. Dinesh Pednekar a/w. Mr. Chanakya Keswani i/b. Economic
Laws Practice for the applicant / defendant no.4.
Mr. R.S. Ghadge i/b. A.S. Desai for Defendant No.5.13.

                                   CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 14th MARCH, 2019.

P.C.:

. By order dated 14/02/2019, this Court had directed the defendants to serve the other defendants and to file the affidavit of service evidencing the service of this Chamber summons on the defendants. Mr. Dinesh Pednekar, the learned counsel for the defendant no.4 has filed the affidavit of service. It is stated that the notice has been served on the other defendants except defendant nos.3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16 to 21 and 23. The learned counsel for the 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 16/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2019 22:48:08 ::: P.H. Jayani 04 CHS1357.18.doc defendant no.4 states that the notice could not be served on the afore stated defendants as the same has been returned by the postal authorities. He seeks leave to serve the aforesaid defendants by substitute service / publication.

2. Leave is granted. Defendant no.4 is permitted to serve the aforesaid unserved defendants by substitute service / publication.

3. Stand over to 11/04/2019.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 16/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2019 22:48:08 :::