Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Kerala High Court

P.M.Mohamed Firoz vs P.M.Mohamed Iqbal on 14 June, 2011

Author: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

Bench: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, S.S.Satheesachandran

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RFA.No. 222 of 2009()


1. P.M.MOHAMED FIROZ,S/O.P.M.ABOOBACKER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. P.M.MOHAMED IQBAL,AGED 36 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.FIROZ

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN

 Dated :14/06/2011

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
                                    &
               S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ.
                    -----------------------------------
                    R.F.A.No.222 OF 2009
                   ------------------------------------
              Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011


                           JUDGMENT

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J.

This appeal was admitted on 21.5.2009. Balance court fee has not been paid so far in spite of repeated postings before the Registrar. Even today, learned counsel for the appellant says that they want to send a registered letter to the party. Whatever that be, the fact remains that balance court fee is not paid within a reasonable time. The appeal is hence rejected. Refund the court fee already paid.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge.

Sd/-

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge.

kkb.15/6.