Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Diljit Builders & Associates Pvt Ltd & vs Liquidator Of Piramal Financial ... on 10 February, 2016

Bench: Jayant Patel, Anant S. Dave

                  O/OJCA/74/2016                                                ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) NO. 74 of 2016
                                                In
                                   O.J.APPEAL NO. 45 of 2015
                                                In
                         COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 437 of 2009
                                                In
                            COMPANY PETITION NO. 147 of 2000

         ==========================================================
              DILJIT BUILDERS & ASSOCIATES PVT LTD & 1....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
           LIQUIDATOR OF PIRAMAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         J SAGAR ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 2
         MR RM DESAI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.
                        JAYANT PATEL
                        and
                        HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE

                                       Date : 10/02/2016


                                         ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JAYANT PATEL)

1. The present application is filed essentially with a view to see that the applicants may be permitted to pay the impact fee for protecting the property and for such purpose, seals may be reopened to enable the officials of the Municipal Corporation to have the measurements.

2. We have heard Mr. Bijal Chhatrapati, learned counsel appearing Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Feb 11 02:29:18 IST 2016 O/OJCA/74/2016 ORDER for the applicants.

3. The offer on the part of the applicants can be appreciated for regularization of construction, if otherwise permissible in law. But at the same time, two aspects need to be emphasized; one is that the transaction in favour of the applicants is held to be ab initio void and another is that the seals are applied by the Official Liquidator as per the interim order passed in O.J. Appeal No. 45 of 2015. If the applicants are really desirous to see that the construction is considered for regularization and thereby construction is to be protected, it would be for the applicants to deposit the amount of impact fee which is stated to be approximately Rs. 3.50 Lacs with the Official Liquidator plus the expenses of about Rs. 50,000/-, total Rs. 4.00 Lacs, with the Official Liquidator and upon such deposit on or before 12th February 2016, the Official Liquidator may apply for regularization of the so-called construction, if permissible in accordance with law. The amount, if any, deposited shall be subject to the final order which may be passed by this Court in O.J. Appeal No. 45 of 2015. However, it is observed that if the amount is not deposited, the same will be at the risk and peril of the applicants.

4. The application disposed of.

(JAYANT PATEL, ACJ.) (ANANT S.DAVE, J.) pirzada Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Feb 11 02:29:18 IST 2016