Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Maramreddy Sairam vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 16 September, 2025

3




            APHC010452382025
it.   ^-1                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                                   AT AMARAVATI
                                        (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                          TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
                                TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                               PRESENT

                        THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

                                 WRIT PETITION NO: 22974 OF 2025

            Between;


            Maramreddy Sairam, S/o. M. Venkata Subba Reddy, Aged about 28 years,
            Occ: Student, R/o. D.No.1-107, Hanumanthunipadi Village and Mandal,
            Prakasam District - 523 227.


                                                                             ...PETITIONER

                                                    AND


               1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School
                   Education Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
               2. The Director of School Education, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
               3. The Convenor of Mega DSC, A.P. School Education Department,
                   Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
               4. The District Education Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District.

                                                                          ...RESPONDENTS

                 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
            circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

            pleased to issue an Order, Proceeding, Direction or an appropriate Writ,, more
            particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus           declaring the high
            handed action of the Respondent No. 3 in issuing the merit list          without

            considering the Petitioner objection as per the academic book and rules of
            Five for a question No. 191, question ID 3922663271, for the exam conducted
 S'
     for the Post of Physical Education Teacher, vide Notification No. 01/Mega
     DSC-TRC-01/2025, dated 20.04.2025 conducted on 22.06.2025 by changing
     the correct answers in the revised final key and released score card without
     adding marks as illegal, arbitrary, unjust in violation of principles of natural
     justice, and violation of article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and
     consequently direct the Respondents to correct the same to the petitioner,
     release fresh score cards and reissue the merit list for Prakasam District.
     lA NO: 1 OF 2025


           Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
     in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
     direct the Respondents to reserve one post for the Petitioner for the Post of
     Physical Education Teacher in Prakasam District in mega DSC vide 01/Mega
     DSC-TRC-01/2025 dated 20.04.2025, in the interest of justice              pending
     disposal of the main Writ Petition.

     Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. P. SARASWATHI
     Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR SERVICES II
     The Court made the following order:
         APHC010452382025
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V*-'
    i
                                         AT AMARAVATI                        [3460]

                                 (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                    TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
                           TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
                                         PRESENT

                  THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
                             WRIT PETITION NO: 22974/2025

        Between:
            1.MARAMREDDY SAIRAM, S/0. M. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY,
             AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC STUDENT, R/O.D.NO.1-107,
             HANUMANTHUNIPADl VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM
              DISTRICT - 523 227.

                                                                    ...PETITIONER

                                            AND
            1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
               SECRETARY,           SCHOOL        EDUCATION         DEPARTMENT,
              VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
            2.THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MANGALAGIRI,
               GUNTUR DISTRICT.

            3.THE CONVENOR OF MEGA DSC, A.P. SCHOOL EDUCATION
               DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
            4.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM
               DISTRICT.

                                                               ...RESPONDENT(S);

               Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in
         the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court
         may be pleased to issue an Order, Proceeding, Direction or
                                                                                   an



         appropriate Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
         declaring the high handed action of the Respondent No. 3 in issuing the
    merit list without considering the Petitioner objection as per the academic
  book and rules of FIVB for
                             a question No. 191, question ID 3922663271
  for the exam conducted for
                                   the Post of Physical Education Teacher vide
  Notification No.01/Mega DSC-TRC 01/2025, dated 20.04.2025 conducted
  on 22.06.2025 by changing the
                                      correct answers in the revised final key
  and released score card without adding marks as illegal, arbitrary, unjust
  in violation of principles of natural justice , and violation of article 14, 19
  and 21 of the Constitution of India and
                                               consequently direct the
  Respondents to correct the
                             same to the petitioner, release fresh score
 cards and reissue the merit list for Prakasam district and pass such other
 order.



 jA NO: 1 OF 202/^

       Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
 stated in the affidavit filed i
                               in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to direct the Respondents to reserve one post for the
Petitioner for the Post of Physical Education Teacher
                                              ^       in Prakasam District
in Mega DSC vide 01/Mega DSC-TRC-01/2025 dated 20.04.2025, in the
interest of justice pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass
such other order.


Counsel for the Petitioner:
   1.P SARASWATHI

Counsel for the Respondent{S):
   1.GP FOR SERVICES II

The Court made the following:
 fev




                THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

                          WRIT PETITION No. 22974 of 2025


      ORDER:

1. In the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner is questioning the correctness of the answer key with respect to Question ID 3922663271 bearing Question No. 191, which was issued pursuant to Notification No.1/Mega-DSC-TRC-1/2025, dated 20.04.2025.

2. The Petitioner contends that the academic literature of this question is contrary to the answer key provided by the Respondents.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education would submit that the answer key was issued after consultation with experts and no interference is called for.

4. Considering the submissions made, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions:

(i) The Petitioner shall submit a representation to the Respondents enclosing the supporting academic literature to Question ID 3922663271 bearing Question No. 191.

V

(ii) Upon receipt of the said representation, the Respondents shall examine it along with the enclosed academic literature, consider its feasibility, and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible.

(iii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- K TATA RAO //TRUE COPY// DEPLOY f^gSTRAR SEcflON OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, School Education Department State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The Director of School Education, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

3. The Convenor of Mega DSC A.P. School Education Department, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

4. The District Education Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District.

5. One CC to M/s. P. Saraswathi, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP for Services- II High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies.

ssb HIGH COURT DATED;16/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 22974 OF 2025 T.f;; ,6, ?6 m ml.

coh W . Currers'E seaion , DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS