Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 1]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Devendra Singh Sengar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 April, 2015

                                                      M.Cr.C.No.5116/2014

                                            ­  1  ­

17.4.2015         Shri Himanshu Sharma, counsel for applicant. 
                  Shri F.A.Shah, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent.

Heard on admission.  

The applicant has challenged the registration of  crime No.414/2013 against the applicant for offence  under Section 166 (A) (C) of IPC.  

The facts of the case, in short, are that, an FIR  was lodged by the prosecutrix against one constable  Rajendra   Jatav   that   he   committed   rape   upon   her  and   the   matter   was   referred   by   the   prosecutrix  before   the   applicant,   who   did   not   lodge   the   FIR.  Thereafter, a complaint was made by the prosecutrix  before the CSP concerned that the applicant did not  follow the modified provisions of Section 154 of IPC  and   therefore,   he   committed   crime   under   Section  166 (A) (C) of IPC.  

After considering the submissions made by the  learned   counsel   for   the   parties,   prima   facie   it  appears that the applicant being an officer who was  required   to   lodge   the   FIR   and   to   investigate   the  M.Cr.C.No.5116/2014 ­  2  ­ matter   according   to   the   amended   provisions   of  Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. has flouted the provisions  of law and prima facie offence under Section 166­A 

(a) (c) of IPC is made out against him.   Under such  circumstances, it cannot be said that a false FIR has  been lodged against the applicant.  

At   present,   there   is   no   basis   to   quash   the  registration of crime No.414/2013.  It is not a case,  in   which   inherent   powers   of   this   Court   under  Section   482   of   the   Cr.P.C.   may   be   exercised   in  favour of the applicant.   Petition under Section 482  of the Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant Devendra Singh  Sengar appears to be not acceptable.  

Consequently, it is hereby dismissed at motion  stage. 

(N.K.Gupta)                  Judge Pushpendra